By Catholic News Service (see source here)
VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- Here at a glance are the basic differences between the Tridentine Mass, promulgated in 1570, and the Roman Missal published in 1969 in response to the reforms called for by the Second Vatican Council:
-- While Latin is the original language of both liturgical texts, the new missal permits use of the vernacular language; because it called for full, active participation, the use of a local congregation's language became customary.
-- With the exception of readings for the feast days of individual saints, the Tridentine Mass has a one-year cycle of Scripture readings. The Vatican II liturgy has a three-year cycle for Sunday readings and a two-year cycle for weekday readings.
-- The old penitential "prayers at the foot of the altar," recited by priests and other ministers before Mass, were replaced by the penitential rite within the Mass, recited by the entire congregation.
-- In the Tridentine Mass, the first half of the liturgy was called the Mass of the Catechumens and almost always included a reading from one of the New Testament epistles and from one of the four Gospels. The new Liturgy of the Word, in accordance with ancient church tradition, almost always begins with a passage from the Old Testament.
-- The Liturgy of the Eucharist, formerly called the Mass of the Faithful, begins with the preparation of the gifts. The old offertory prayers were revised in the new liturgy to avoid what some people saw as a duplication of the eucharistic prayers.
-- Instead of one eucharistic prayer, there are now nine -- four for general Sunday and weekday use, two for Masses focusing on reconciliation and three for Masses for children.
-- In the new Mass, the Communion rite was simplified, allowing communicants to receive the Eucharist under the forms of both bread and wine.
-- The new Mass eliminated the recitation at the end of every Mass of what was known as the "last Gospel" -- the beginning of the Gospel of St. John.
-- A priest celebrated the Tridentine Mass facing east, which -- given the layout of most churches -- meant he celebrated with his back to the congregation. Since the promulgation of the Roman Missal, the priest normally faces the congregation.
Thursday, June 28, 2007
Differences Between Tridentine & Modern Mass
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Do you realize how complicated this sounds. Although I understand the purpose to some extent, I don't think I have the intelligence to become catholic. I do love the church and it's members greatly, though.
From a simple minded protestant!
The simple-minded Protestants are the best kind, because in my experience, they tend to be the most practical.
Really, I'm sorry if all this stuff is confusing. Being a Catholic blog, many of the posts often presuppose the reader has some knowledge of Catholicism. I do try to clue Protestants in on things from time to time, but occasionally I get caught up in the dialog and forget to do this. My apologies.
Basically, the above post is mainly for reference purposes. The average Catholic probably doesn't even realize there is that much difference between the old and new mass.
From a Protestant perspective, looking at the Church from the outside in, things will be a lot more simple than it sounds once the Pope's motu proprio (document expressing his own will) on the Tridentine mass is released.
Here is what it amounts to as far as you, and other Protestants, are concerned. Catholics who like to worship in Latin, the old fashioned way, will be able to freely. While Catholics who like to worship in English, the modern way, will continue to be able to freely. That's it. End of story. It really is as simple as that.
I appreciate your friendship. The clarification was all I needed. Why didn't you just say that? HE- He :)
Post a Comment