(WorldNetDaily) - The shroud, therefore, they concluded, was not created by paint soaking through the linen or by a photographic image printing through to the reverse side, because the front and back facial images are not identical and the center fibers show no image creation whatsoever.
Fanti and Maggiolo concluded the shroud image was created by a "corona discharge," understood as a radiant burst of light and energy that scorched the body image of the crucified man on the topmost fibers of the shroud's front and back sides, without producing any image on the centermost of its linen fibers....
read full story here
THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: This is one historical relic about which 'The Catholic Knight' has no doubt. As far as I'm concerned, this IS a legitimate artifact of Jesus Christ, and the image above is indeed the face of our Lord at the moment of his resurrection.
2 comments; post here:
Sir Knight, i am always amused when i hear skeptics delcare the shroud a "forgery" UMMM, forgery of what? there has to be an original somewhere. This cloth has too many unanswered qustions for it to be a "fake" or medeival "relic" Science has yet to explain how the image was "imprinted" upon it so perfectly. The only discrepancy is the gospel account of a separate "head covedring" for Christ's burial cloths. However, until science can DISPROVE its authenticity, I go with believing that it was indeed Our Lord's. Pete Frey
I think there's a fantastic website for the holy shroud: www.sabanasanta.org
There's also a link for videos and so... many of them in english. I think the holy shroud is the true mirror of the Gospel.
Post a Comment