THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: The Great Modernist Schism in the Catholic Church will most probably occur sometime between 2011 and 2020. It's ironic that this time period will mark the 500th anniversary of the Protestant Schism in Europe. However, the Great Modernist Schism of the 21st century will be much bigger than anything the Catholic Church has experienced in the last millennium. The closest thing that could compare would be the Arian schism of the 4th century, in which at one time there were actually more Arians than Catholics. This Modernist schism may not likely be that big, but it will be comparable.The players in this schism are primarily in the United States, though Europe will most certainly have a significant influence as well. However, since the founding of Catholic Christianity in the Americas five-hundred years ago, there has not been a
significant schism on these shores. That is about to change. The United States leads the way and will be the principle player in this latest (and possibly final) schism of the worldwide Catholic Church. European countries such as Austria, Germany, France and England may also play a significant (but supportive) role to the primarily American led schism. The highest principle player is the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, which has for years been duped into supporting liberal causes and has generally been a very weak advocate of the traditional Catholic faith. The USCCB, as it is called, will ultimately play a sucker role as it will continue to be inadvertently used to promote the very schism that will ultimately tear it apart. Behind the scenes is a subversive player called the American Catholic Council. This is a liberal front group, designed to rally dissident Catholics in the years ahead in what may become direct opposition to the USCCB and the Vatican. In the opinion of this blogger, the American Catholic Council will most likely serve to replace the USCCB as THE primary consulting body for the majority of US Catholic parishes. The stated goals of the American Catholic Council are taken from their own website here, and are listed below in black. My commentary is in blue...Further investigation of this group's website will reveal latent influence by homosexual and radical feminist sub-groups. The collective gathering of various dissident Catholic sub-groups, under one umbrella organization, can only spell a recipe for schism. The first meeting of the American Catholic Council is scheduled for June 10-12 of 2011. I expect more will follow.
- We seek a Church that is inclusive, compassionate, trustworthy, and representative. (It sounds nice, but the key word here is "representative." This is code for ecclesiastical democracy. These people want to be able to "elect" their leaders, perhaps even their priests or bishops. I suspect that the term "inclusive" in this context may be a reference to female clergy.)
- We seek a Church that actively listens to the Spirit in its people and that worships and evangelizes in the fullness of that inspiration. (Again, this is code for a Church that tells the people what they want to hear, rather than what they need to hear.)
- We seek a Church that addresses the spiritual hunger of all Catholics, including marginalized and former Catholics. (The term "marginalized Catholics" is code for dissident Catholics, meaning those who oppose the teachings of the Catholic Church.)
- We seek to multiply the bread of the Eucharist so that a malnourished Catholic Community can encounter Christ with all the healing power of his sacramental presence through the preservation of parish community and a radically inclusive theology of ministry. (The term "radically inclusive theology" in relation to the Eucharist is almost universally recognized in religious circles as acceptance of homosexuality. The term "multiply the bread of the Eucharist" is a way of saying that communion should be open to all, Catholics and non-Catholics alike, and especially those who oppose the Church's teaching on Christian sexual ethics.)
- We seek reform of the governing structures in our Church so that they reflect the better aspects of the American experience: a democratic spirit, concern for human rights, freedom of speech and assembly, and a tradition of participation and representation. (Once again, this summarizes the above stated goals of changing the structure of Catholic parishes, and perhaps even dioceses, into a democracy, where leaders are elected based on what the people want to hear, rather than what they need to hear, making room for dissidents to become leaders and the Church's moral teachings to become subject to collective opinion.)
The next big player in the Great Modernist Schism is none other than President Barrack Hussein Obama. This liberal American president has been playing the weakness of the US Catholic Church for a political angle. He knows this will be one of the largest organizations standing against his reelection campaign in 2012, and therefore in order to crack its influence over Catholic voters the organization itself must be cracked. To do this Obama has systematically been taking advantage of liberal dissidents within the US Catholic Church, by appointing as many of these dissidents as possible to the highest offices of the land. Simultaneously, Obama has accepted invitations to be awarded with honors at various dissident Catholic organizations around the nation - including the University of Notre Dame in Indiana. These public acts create confusion among the general Catholic population in the United States, presenting the image of a divided Catholic Church, which is EXACTLY what the president wants.The final big player in this Great Modernist Schism is none other than the mainstream news media fueling the sex-abuse scandal in the Catholic Church and forming public opinion about it. Though statistics indicate that sexual abuse of minors and subsequent cover up is no higher in the Catholic Church than any other denomination or religious organization, the mainstream news media continues to focus it's spotlight on Rome. There is a reason for this and it is intentional. Because the Catholic Church is the largest Christian Church in the world, and because the players in the mainstream news media hate Christianity in general, it only makes sense to attack the largest Christian organization first. The idea is to bring down the big boys, and then watch the little boys run for cover. Strike the shepherd and the sheep will scatter.
Destroy the Catholic Church, and all of the smaller Christian denominations will head for the hills. It will be much easier to take down the smaller Christian denominations once the largest is crippled. The United States is now leading the charge against the Vatican by allowing an illegal lawsuit to go forward that would implicate the Vatican (and the pope himself) as responsible for sexual abuse by Catholic priests in the United States. This is under the ridiculous notion that the Vatican acts as an "employer" to these abusive priests. The premise of the lawsuit is absurd and has no basis in reality or common law but nevertheless the lawsuit will go forward, and the ensuing media flurry that will surround it will only bolster the position of dissident Catholics. It is highly unlikely the Vatican will win the lawsuit against it, even though the Vatican is right and the lawsuit is baseless. This is because public opinion of the Catholic Church has been so soured over the years by relentless reporting of sex-abuse, that it will be virtually impossible for the Vatican to receive a fair trial. Furthermore, just the image of a Vatican official in court itself, will be enough for the mainstream news media to put the final nails in the coffin of the US Catholic Church. In the public eye, all moral credibility of the pope, Vatican and US Catholic Church will be completely destroyed. Dissident bishops, priests and laity will increasingly see no need to follow the leadership of a seemingly defunct pope or an obsolete Catholic hierarchical system. All the conditions for schism will be ripe in 2011 and in that year the process will most likely begin. When it will be complete is up for debate.
The time for straddling the fence is over. If you're a Catholic who wishes to remain faithful to the pope then it's time to get out of the progressive Catholic parishes NOW. Beware of any parish or priest that makes reference to the American Catholic Council (or ACC). Beware of any parish or priest that makes reference to the language used in the ACC's agenda listed above. Find a relatively conservative, traditional and orthodox Catholic parish as quickly as possible and get your family involved there. Spread the word to your Catholic family and friends, notifying them of the impending schism and the players involved. Try to salvage as much of US Catholicism as you can, before it's too late. Finally, the only thing left to do is pray. Pray the rosary. PRAY HARD!
13 comments; post here:
Mr Knight, this sort of thing has been happening since the 70s; or actually the 1870s if you want to go back to the Americanist heresy which Leo XIII condemned. The difference now is that the liberals have taken possession of the church structure aided and abetted by un-catholic laity. They have been aching for a split from Rome ever since they thought Vat II gave them the green light.
I truly believe that Pope Benedict's plans to enforce a return to catholic discipline will, as you so wisely said mean that it is time to get off the fence, if one is a catholic, one supports the pope and all church teachings. I would just say, however, that in practical terms, the schism is already here. It is just waiting for the "right moment" to make it official. The pope has already said that there will be a "smaller, but more dynamic church" in the future. If schism comes,it may be the way to cleanse the church; to those who whis to leave, i say "dont let the door hit you in the ass on the way" Pete Frey (permission to repost?)
Sir Knight,
I agree with Mr. Frey--the schism is already here. In my diocese in PA, there are ZERO conservative, traditional, or orthodox churches except for the one Mass offered by the FSSP, which is merely tolerated. In fact, in recent years they have been severely limited and restricted. We have since left for the SSPX. The problem is this--there are moderate numbers of traditional minded Catholics are sitting in these Churches afraid to leave because they don't want to defy their bishops or the Pope. They will continue to sit and go right along with all the mess. It's sad, but some of these people are our friends. I pray everyday that our friends wake up sooner than later. I'd hate to see them go in this direction. May God have mercy....
Funny you mention this, Sir Knight. It reminds me of the Gospel of this past past Tuesday, the Solemnity of St. Peter & St. Paul. Let us not forget Christ's Words in Matthew 16:13-19:
"And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of the netherworld (Hell) shall not prevail against it." No matter what these Liberal floosies do, they will NEVER, EVER, destroy that which is the One,Holy,Catholic, and Apostolic Chruch.
MoreWe are particularly thankful to you for your part in the movement to have the words ‘under God’ added to our Pledge of Allegiance. These words will remind Americans that despite our great physical strength we
must remain humble. They will help us to keep constantly in our minds and hearts the spiritual and moral principles which alone give dignity to man, and upon which our way of life is founded. For the contribution
which your organization has made to this cause, we must be genuinely grateful.”
President Dwight D Eisenhower
Pete Frey
Sounds like another branch of the Episcopal Church in the making. OH MY!
The Modernist Schism started in 1958 with the (s)election of the false "Pope" John XXIII - that's when the modernists took over.
Anonymous, I tend to disagree. Pope John XXIII was not only properly elected, and a true pope, but he was also a liturgical TRADITIONALIST by the standards of 1958 and an ultra-traditionalist by today's standards.
I do however, agree that Pope John XXIII did have a problem. It was a human problem. He was naive about the dangers surrounding the Church at that point in time. He failed to heed the warnings of Fatima, and called for an ecumenical council at the worst possible time. In spite of that, Pope John XXIII rejected any attempt to radically alter the liturgy of the Church during the Second Vatican Council, and it was Pope Paul VI who eventually permitted it.
I would love to just be able to point to one blunder in history and blame everything on that. It would be convenient to say Pope John XXIII was an antipope, or say the same about Pope Paul VI, but I'm afraid the problems that face the Church are just not that simple. The seeds of the Modernist Schism were sown in the late 19th century, and grown to maturity during the 20th century. Our Lady of Fatima warned us of this in advance, but so few took her seriously. Now the Church will pay the consequences for her folly and this is necessary for the purification to come.
Sedevacatism makes no sense anonymous, and it fails to address the real problem of Modernism. Instead it wallows in a bed of conspiracy theories that in the end do nothing to purge the Church of evil, salvage what is left of Catholicism and renew those who can be renewed in the faith. Instead it separates it's adherents from the Church, puts them into a lonely elitist "club," and curses the darkness rather than shining a light.
When this current pope passes away, we will all be sedevacatists, but until then we should cling to the chair of Peter and his successor.
TCK, great repsonse. I knew he was a Sedevacantist the moment he mentioned that false pope statement in the late 50s.
good comment, Sir Knight. sedevacantism is simply anothe form of protestantism Pete Frey
On sedevacatism there is another point to consider. Modernism has taken it's toll on all Western Christianity across the spectrum. Sure, Modernism has affected the Catholic Church, however, the effect on Protestant denominations is considerable. In fact, we could easily say that Modernism has been spearheaded by some Protestant denominations in particular. Take the Anglican Communion, and The Episcopal Church USA for example. There are others, but this is one Catholics would be most familiar with.
The point is this. Modernism is a trans-denominational problem. It runs through all Christianity, not just the Catholic Church, and is tearing away at the fabric of Western civilization. The legacy of Modernism is depopulation. Modernism's embrace (and promotion) of abortion and artificial contraception has depopulated Europe and North America to the extent that Islamic immigrants are taking over the EU, and the USA is so dependent on illegal immigration from Mexico that it's population will soon implode without it. (That's the dirty little secret American politicians will never tell you.)
What I'm saying here is that you can't blame any one particular pope, or buy into a conspiracy about the legitimate apostolic secession of the papacy, without avoiding the real problem. If you buy into sedevacatism, you're closing your eyes. You're saying the entire Modernist crisis in the world today is the result of a single event that happened fifty years ago. You've limited your perspective to the Catholic Church alone, failed to recognize the broader Modernist strategy, forgotten the warning of Our Lady of Fatima, and misidentified the source of the problem by nearly 100 years! You've bought into the notion that the only solution is to retreat into a shell, wallow in conspiracy theories, curse the darkness and do nothing to shine a light and fight the real fight. Your witness as a Catholic is effectively neutralized. Good job!
Now, if you want to get back on board with the army of Christ then all you need do is recognize that Pope Benedict XVI is the current successor of Saint Peter, and that in spite of everything Modernism has done to attack the Church, the Vatican itself has not given into it's lure of sexual license and gender confusion. The pope stands strong against the rising tide of Modernism, and that's why the Left hates him. That's why the Modernists within the U.S. Catholic Church will soon break with him. They will do this because if they want to continue with their liberal modernist trends, they will have no choice but to break with the See of Peter.
How about if the abortion and birth control industries start targeting the Muslim world? They can make a truck load of money there.
Another way to know if your parish is faithful to the truths of the faith is to ask your pastor what he thinks of Karl Rahner. If his opinion is positive, find another parish ASAP, and write or call your Bishop to tell him why you are changing parishes.
Great blog! I wish to make a few comments. I am not a sede-vacantist but I have come to believe through much research that Pope John XXIII was hopelessly naive and malfeasant in office by calling a council, depending upon on the "medicine of mercy" instead of anathemas to address any serious problems (heresies) within the Church and then by not overtly condemning communism at the Council. Secondly, I cannot help but believe that Pope Paul VI was an indecisive man, a socialist, unfit to lead the Church, and seriously deluded by Modernism. He is the primary reason why the Church is in the mess it is in today. Any supposedly knowledgeable Catholic who denies this fact needs help.
Post a Comment