"An Adult faith does not follow the waves of fashion and the latest novelties."
Pope Benedict XVI

Monday, January 10, 2011

Blood of the Martyrs

Pagans fed Christians to lions for entertainment
during ancient Roman persecutions.
THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: Christianity is by far the single most persecuted religion in the world and in history. In spite of this, it is also the largest religion in the world and in history. This can only be attributed to the hand of God, for as the old saying goes "the blood of the martyrs are the seeds of the Church".

It's always been this way you see. Christianity was first persecuted by ancient Judaism, which directly led to the persecution of the early Church by the ancient Roman empire. The party of the Pharisees approached Caesar in the late 1st century and notified Caesar that the Christians no longer practiced the Jewish religion (as the Pharisees defined it) and were therefore no longer entitled to the same religious exemptions Jews enjoyed under the ancient Roman empire. (Jews were exempt from Caesar worship so long as they prayed for Caesar to God.). Once the Jewish exemption was removed from Christianity, the early Church fell under the same laws as the Roman pantheon of Pagan religions. Thus Christians were required to worship Caesar along with all the Pagans. Of course Christians refused, and so began one of the most ferocious periods of Christian persecution by the state. It lasted over 240 years! In spite of this the Church grew and eventually became the dominant religion in the empire. Only the hand of divine providence can explain this.

Perhaps one of the longest periods of rest from persecution was during the early middle ages, before the rise of Islam in the middle east. With the "prophet" Mohammad however, came the end of relative peace and tranquility. For the centuries to follow, to this very day, Christianity has suffered under the yoke of Islam. Periods of Islamic persecution against Christians had actually reached such extremes that European kings (including the pope) at some times even saw it necessary to wage retaliatory wars (crusades) against Muslim jihads deep into Christian territory. In spite of the crusades however, Christianity has lost some two-thirds of it's territories to Islam. (All of Northern Africa and the Middle East, up trough Turkey were at one time Christian countries.)

Christianity enjoyed relative security in Europe, Russia and the Americas for centuries following the fall of Christianity to Islam in the Middle East and Northern Africa. The late middle ages were are period of missionary expansion for both Christians and Muslims in the new worlds. For Christianity, missionary expansion was found in the Pagan regions North and South America. Muslims saw most of their new converts in Africa and Asia. By the 20th century that era officially came to a close.

The 20th century was an era of dichotomy. On the one hand, the people of the 20th century enjoyed unprecedented technological development with the expansion of knowledge and education. There has been no previous era in history like it. On the other hand, the 20th century was the most bloody and barbaric period of world history ever known. More people died from wars during the 20th century than all previous centuries combined. Entire cities were leveled and civilizations upturned. The world is still reeling from the 20th century, and the full effects will not be known for centuries to come.

It was during the 20th century that Christianity's last "safe haven" in Europe, Russia and the Americas was thrown into upheaval. The rise of Marxism, in various forms (communism, socialism and fascism) brought with it direct persecution of the Church. Nations that turned to communism (China, Russia and Eastern Europe) persecuted Christians most severely, imprisoning virtually all believers and confiscating church property. Next in line were the fascist nations that persecuted Christians who dared to resist the influence of the state, confiscating church property and imprisoning Church leaders. Finally, nations that embraced socialism (Western Europe and the Americas) persecuted Christians through means of defamatory propaganda, creating public intolerance, and gradual state intrusion into Church business. By the early 21st century, Christianity was so reviled by public opinion that western society thought nothing of threatening to remove the tax exemption status for Christian churches, all the while using those same tax regulations to control what pastors say behind the pulpit. Lawsuits were filed against churches for "discriminating" against the new Marxist morality, and legislation was passed to criminalize basic Christian teaching on sexual morality. Of course, much of this was spurred on by the news and entertainment media which virtually encourage anti-Christian sentiment.

By the late 20th century to early 21st century Islam reared it's ugly head again in the form of radical fundamentalism. Once again, Christians in Africa, Asia and the Middle East began to be persecuted in force. Now there seems to be no end to the violence.

So by the early 21st century, between Marxist ideology and Islamic fundamentalism, Christianity has once again seen the most persecution since the days of the ancient Roman empire. More Christians have died for their faith over the last 100 years than in all previous centuries combined. If history is any indication of the future, and the blood of the martyrs really are the seeds of the Church, than we can only assume that a great worldwide Christian Renaissance must be on it's way, or else if not, this really is the end of time.

12 comments; post here:

scotju said...

Sir Knight, have you ever read Rabbi Newman's "Jewish Influence on Christian Reform Movements"? This book shows that Jewish groups and individuals continued their harassment and persecution of the Church, long after they lost their power to directly harm Christians or influence pagan Roman emperors to do their work for them. If you don't have a copy, you should order one. It's out of print, so you might have to request a library loan or shell out a few extra bucks for a copy. I hope you can locate one for yourself. it's a worthwhile investment.

Roberto said...

This is our fate and our destiny... We must accept and embrace it.. And always be ready to die for our faith, to die for love of Christ.
It is written in Matthew 10:22
"You will be hated by all because of My name, but it is the one who has endured to the end who will be saved."

Anonymous said...

Christianity not persecuted and if you follow scripture you'll be more socialist than capitalist. You know you cant serve to masters God and wealth.

The only persecution is manufactured.

scotju said...

Anonymous, this isn't my blog, but I resent trolls like you hijacking a thread to spread your propaganda. Nowhere does the traditions of the Catholic Church endorse any kind of socialism. Christianity (Catholicism) is the most persecuted religion in the world. Read the New Testament, especially the words of the saviour himself. "As the world hates me, so shall it hate you". Persection manufactored? Yeah, it's "manfactored" by all those who hate God and his Son.

The Catholic Knight said...

Anonymous,

That was written like a true Marxist. Only a devout follower of Marx, Lenin and Stalin would make such an ridiculous and offensive anti-Christian statement. You are denying a holocaust and offending the memories of those who have suffered and died for their faith, even as recently as a couple weeks ago in Iraq. But I would expect nothing less of a Marxist who denies the Christian holocaust. Marxists have themselves been the biggest contributors to the Christian holocaust over the last century. Of course you would deny it.

By the way, the Scriptures plainly teach against socialism and capitalism. The position of the Scriptures and the Church is Distributism. Google it. But I suppose you won't as you already deny the Holocaust of Chrisian blood, so it's obvious you're not into dealing with the truth or reality.

Anonymous said...

I love the ad hominim attacks for a statement that was true. What I said was true. The bible is more socialist than capitalist. I never said the bible wasn't capitalist at all.

So the Christian being persecuted is here is the so called troll. The one that knows that distribitism is a form of socialism with expressly given rights to private property its one of the forms of socialism. Socialism has many forms, communism is not the only form.

As for capitalism if you are talking about Adam Smith's version you are right. If you are talking about modern capitalism you are wrong. The bible is very critical on greed. Luke 16:1-13, Matt 6:24, 1 Cor 6:10.
As for what you call distributism which is a rename for socialism with private property(expressed not implied) see Acts 2:44-45.

I guesses I must be blessed for you are uttering all kinds of evil against me falsely and all I was trying to do was show that Jesus did not want what we have.

I feel sorry for your readers you are doing them a disservice I hope they never take a Poli Sci class they'd probably fail.

The Catholic Knight said...

Anonymous,

Calling you out on a grievous error is not "persecution" and you now it. Persecution is when people are deprived of their civil rights for religious, cultural or ethnic reasons. You know that too. In contrast, I have not only allowed you to post your errors here, but I have also allowed you to defend yourself here. Neither of these are "rights" on you part, as this is my forum, and I can do whatever I want on it. Nevertheless in the name of dialogue I have allowed you to express your faulty opinions. If you call that "persecution" just because I call you out on it, than I can't help you.

It is funny that you should call yourself "persecuted" at all, since in your previous post you said "The only persecution is manufactured." In your particular case I would have to agree, since pointing our errors (even name calling) is not persecution. You can call it "rude" if you want, but it's not persecution.

Now as for the "ad hominims," as you called them, they are only statement of observation based on your own statements. The "tone" of my own post to you was not a reaction to your heretical views on economics but on your denial of the persecution of the Church, which is an insult to all of those who have given their blood for the Gospel. If you call yourself a Christian, than you should be ashamed of yourself for such disrespect of those who gave their lives (and are still giving their lives) while you live in the luxury of a society that tolerates your beliefs. That is the only part of your remarks that disgusts me.

Now as for your nonsensical remarks on Distributism, I have already pointed out it is neither Capitalist nor Socialist, but a third way that objects to both extremes. True wealth is measured in property, and you know that. The problem with capitalism is that it concentrates property into the hands of just a few corporate oligarchs, while socialism concentrates property into the hands of the government. Both systems are immoral. The Bible knows nothing of socialism, but strongly condemns elements of capitalism. To say the Bible is more "socialist than capitalist" is categorically wrong, because the Bible knows nothing of socialism. Nowhere in the Bible do the Scriptures tell us it is the duty of the government to redistribute wealth. That right is given strictly the the Church (ecclesia) and it is reserved to those who give to the Church VOLUNTARILY. By definition, voluntary contribution IS NOT socialism. You know that too.

Tabitha said...

in no way shape or form that the bible is socialist or capitalist.
here's definitions of of both Distributism and Socialism(Marxism):

Distributism (also known as distributionism, distributivism) is a third-way economic philosophy formulated by such Roman Catholic thinkers as G. K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc to apply the principles of Catholic Social Teaching articulated by the Catholic Church, especially in Pope Leo XIII's encyclical Rerum Novarum[1] and more expansively explained by Pope Pius XI's encyclical Quadragesimo Anno[2]

According to distributism, the ownership of the means of production should be spread as widely as possible among the general populace, rather than being centralized under the control of the state (state socialism) or a few large businesses or wealthy private individuals (plutarchic capitalism). A summary of distributism is found in Chesterton's statement: "Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few capitalists."[3]

Essentially, distributism distinguishes itself by its distribution of property (not to be confused with redistribution of capital that would be carried out by most socialist plans of governance). While socialism allows no individuals to own productive property (it all being under state, community, or workers' control), distributism itself seeks to ensure that most people will become owners of productive property. As Belloc stated, the distributive state (that is, the state which has implemented distributism) contains "an agglomeration of families of varying wealth, but by far the greater number of owners of the means of production."[4] This broader distribution does not extend to all property, but only to productive property; that is, that property which produces wealth, namely, the things needed for man to survive. It includes land, tools, etc.[5]

Distributism has often been described as a "third way," in opposition to both socialism and capitalism. Thomas Storck argues that "both socialism and capitalism are products of the European Enlightenment and are thus modernizing and anti-traditional forces. In contrast, distributism seeks to subordinate economic activity to human life as a whole, to our spiritual life, our intellectual life, our family life".[6]
there is a difference


Socialism(Marxism) is an economic and political theory advocating public or common ownership and cooperative management of the means of production and allocation of resources.[1][2][3] A socialist society is a social structure organized on the basis of relatively equal power-relations, self-management, dispersed decision-making (adhocracy) and a reduction or elimination of hierarchical and bureaucratic forms of administration and governance; the extent of which varies in different types of socialism.[4][5] This ranges from the establishment of cooperative management structures in the economy to the abolition of all hierarchical structures in favor of free association.
correction Marxism is renamed Socialism.

The Catholic Knight said...

Thank you Tabitha,

That was very timely. I'm afraid our anonymous friend is trying to obfuscate the topic of this thread by getting us onto economics rather than the persecution of the Church.

Many Marxists resort to this tactic, as they feel that economics is their strong point, and of course they would like to get us off the topic of persecution for obvious reasons - their ilk being responsible for much of of the persecution of the Church during the 20th century.

------------------

ATTENTION ALL COMMENTATORS: the topic of economics in this thread is now closed. The subject of this thread is persecution of the Church. Only comments related to persecution of the Church will be posted in this thread from now on.

Tabitha said...

your welcome

If I remember correctly early last year in Nigeria 300 christian nigerians were chased out of there homes by gun shots and killed by machetes by muslim nigerians.
and also Stephen the martyr was stoned to death even alot of the saints have been martyred for the gospel. when the great tribulation comes those who don't take the mark of the beast will be marytred in the future there will be more martyrdom. so for years to come christianity will be persecuted it is in the prophecies of the bible.

The Catholic Knight said...

While I am convinced the future worldwide persecution of Antichrist will take place, I am not convinced the Mark of the Beast is related to it. I think the Mark is symbolic in nature, which represents man's attempt to divinize himself, especially through the government. That being the case I think the Mark of the Beast has been with us for a long time, especially manifesting itself in Ceasar, Napoleon, Hitler and Stalin. We have seen smaller manifestations in among other world leaders as well.

As in the case of the final Antichrist, the writings of both Scripture and the Church Fathers are clear. He will be a Jew who will rise to power initially in the Holy Land (not Europe) and he will manifest himself as the Antichrist when he declares himself Messiah and outlaws Christianity throughout the whole world, putting a stop to the sacraments and shutting down the churches.

Personally, I think we are still a long way off from this final persecution - perhaps hundreds of years. What remains for us today is the persecution of the Marxists and the Muslims.

Tabitha said...

yes I think so too though almost every christian thinks it will happen 12/21/2012 the end of the mayan except for me i have been warning against relying on the mayan calander for the end of the world, christ's coming, and The Great Tribulation. I think of it as a form of idol worship because the prophecies were made by their serpent god Quetzalcoatl of his return as a man with blonde hair blue eyes and a beard.