![]() |
| Our Lady of the Atonement, Anglican Use Catholic Parish, San Antonio Texas |
(American Catholic Magazine) - The 1230 Mass today at London's Westminster Cathedral looked like any other. But for the hint in the booklet for the feast of Mary, Mother of God, that after the homily would be a "Rite of reception and confirmation", there was nothing at all to indicate the significance of what was to happen. The celebrant, an auxiliary bishop of Westminster, Alan Hopes, said nothing at the start of Mass, and it wasn't until the end of a lengthy homily on Mary as Theotokos, or God-bearer, and the controversies of the fourth-century Council of Nicea which led to this Feast, that Bishop Hopes mentioned that they would be receiving some former members of the Church of England into full communion.THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: This new way of being Catholic is going to be a hit in North America, and it's something that many Roman Catholics will identify with. It's extremely traditional, yet extremely practical at the same time. Yes, married men can become priests within the Anglican ordinariates, and it has been made clear that this provision is perpetual. When asked "how long" the Anglican Catholics will be permitted to retain married priests, one Vatican CDF official responded "we'll let you know in a couple hundred years."
They included, he said, three former bishops and their relatives, as well as three Anglican nuns.
It would have been hard, if you had just dropped into the Cathedral for Mass, to understand the significance of what was happening.There was nobody around to explain that these are the founding members of the world's first Ordinariate, the scheme created by Pope Benedict to allow for the corporate reception of Anglicans...
read full story here
Naturally, the Anglican ordinariates are initially designed to accommodate Traditional Anglicans and Anglican Use Catholics, however, the Apostolic Constitution (Anglicanorum Coetibus) is an "open invitation" to all Christians of various denominations, as well as regular Roman Catholics too, if they feel drawn to the Anglican (as opposed to strictly Roman) tradition.
Let me clarify some things here. Practically speaking, Anglican Catholic tradition is so "Catholic" in practice, that it often puts general Roman Catholicism to shame. The Anglican Catholic tradition is part of the Roman Rite. It is, shall we say, a subset or variation of Roman Catholicism. Historically, Rome has always allowed these sorts of things, but this is perhaps the largest exception ever permitted. Anglican Catholics are Roman Catholics, but they have an extra character which comes from the English tradition. Those within the Anglican ordinariates are in full apostolic union with the pope of Rome. The are 100% Catholic, just as regular Roman Catholics are 100% Catholic. Anglican Catholics can lawfully receive communion in any Roman Catholic parish. Likewise, Roman Catholics can lawfully receive communion in any Anglican Catholic parish, and that leads us to an interesting proposition.
Many Roman Catholics are dissatisfied with the current Novus Ordo culture that surrounds the typical celebration of the Novus Ordo ("new order" or "modern vernacular") mass. This is because in the Western world, particularly in English-speaking countries, there has been a tendency to banalize (scale down) the mass to the everyday common culture. Language became remedial (though soon to be improved), celebrations boring, and historic Catholic traditions have been dispensed. The high-church Catholicism of yesteryear is gone. The high altars have been torn down. The canopies were eliminated, and the altar rails have completely disappeared. The statues and icons have been reduced to a minimum. The Catholic parishes of today are barely recognizable from those of ages past. Altar servers once played an essential role in the mass. Today they sit aside and perform only occasional functions. The priest no longer celebrates facing the Lord, but instead the altar has been turned into a common table with the priest facing the people, in what has become something like a performance. Communion is no longer received on the tongue while kneeling. Instead communicants stand and receive the Holy Eucharist on their hands (a dispensation that Rome can revoke at any time). Even worse, many liturgical "experts" have taken it upon themselves to innovate the mass, to "spice it up" a little. They've brought in pop music, with drums and guitars, turning the Catholic mass into something that highly resembles a Protestant service. A whole lot of Catholics are frustrated with this, and have been for some years. Many more young Catholics are for the first time discovering that there is more to their faith than what typically passes for Catholicism in their local parish. They admire the beauty and solemnity found in the Traditional Latin Mass (Tridentine or Extraordinary Form) but find the language barrier difficult to overcome. If only such traditional Catholic worship could be found in the English language.
So enters the Anglican Catholic parishes. They are very traditional, and foster a form of Roman Catholic worship that is beautiful and solemn. The Anglican Catholic mass is perhaps the closest thing to the Traditional Latin Mass one will ever see in English. Not only is it celebrated in English, but High English at that, which is both dignified and beautiful. All of the elements of Traditional Catholicism are present; the high altars, altar rails, iconography, traditional English hymns, chants, priests facing the Lord, communion on the tongue while kneeling, women who veil in the presence of the Lord, and altar servers that actually have an essential role in the liturgy.
In this current Novus Ordo culture, Anglican Catholic worship is sure to attract a lot of Roman Catholics frustrated with the banal and innovative celebrations common in today's world. Rome is okay with that. The invitation of Anglicanorum Coetibus is open, and if some Roman Catholics feel more comfortable worshiping in Anglican Catholic parishes, that's okay, and Rome has certainly foreseen this. In fact, I would dare say Rome is counting on it!
You see Pope Benedict XVI has initiated what many have called the "reform of the reform" of the Roman Rite and the Second Vatican Council. To accomplish this, he has initiated a threefold plan. First, he has restored the Traditional Latin Mass with his motu proprio entitled Summorum Pontificum. This gives all priests, everywhere, the right to celebrate the Traditional Latin Mass of their own accord, if they are competent to do so. They may celebrate such masses privately as well as publicly. Second, he is reforming the Novus Ordo mass, slowly and carefully, both through example and edict. The first major change Catholics in North America will notice over the next year will be the reform of the English translation of the mass. Because the current translation (1971 to 2011) is so remedial that it doesn't even capture the meaning of the original Latin text, Catholics in North America are in for some startling changes just in the language alone, and the pope hasn't even begun to reform the order of liturgy yet. Third and finally, he has created the Apostolic Constitution for Groups of Anglicans (Anglicanorum Coetibus) which is an open door for Protestant converts directly into Traditional Catholicism with an English flare. It is also a refuge for Roman Catholics who are sick and tired of the current Novus Ordo culture.
Traditional Catholics of the Latin persuasion should keep in mind that Traditional Anglican Catholics are their natural allies in the reform of the reform. Historically speaking, Anglican Use parishes have been very friendly to the Traditional Latin Mass and Traditional Anglican churches have been known to celebrate the Tridentine liturgy. There is definitely going to be some crossover between the Traditional Latin and Anglican Catholic parishes. This two is inevitable and should be embraced by both parties.
Of course there is also the issue of married clergy. Let me elaborate. The Catholic Church has always allowed married priests. Let me repeat that. The Catholic Church has ALWAYS allowed married priests. However, it has at times restricted the priesthood to unmarried celibate men, and this is the case for the general Roman Rite. The Roman Rite priesthood was restricted to celibate men in 1123 AD, but this only pertained to the Roman Rite. The Eastern Rites were excluded from this, and in fact, married men are continually ordained in Eastern Catholic churches to this very day. In recent times, Rome has also made an exception for married Protestant clergy who wish to convert and be ordained priests, as well as those of the Anglican tradition. Clerical celibacy is not a Church doctrine. It is merely a discipline of the Church, which Rome can amend or rescind at any time. For now, Rome has seen fit to keep celibacy in the general Roman Rite, however Rome reserves the right to make exceptions, and the Anglican ordinariate is one such exception. The one thing Rome wants to make sure doesn't happen is that married men from the general Roman Rite don't take advantage of one of these exceptions and change rites exclusively for the reason of finding a "backdoor" into the Catholic priesthood. This is why Rome screens every married candidate for the priesthood on a case by case basis.
However, for those Roman Catholics who are simply eager to escape the banal innovations of the Novus Ordo culture, a safe refuge of traditional Catholicism awaits them in the Anglican Catholic parishes. They may become members of such parishes simply by attending mass regularly, and if so inclined, they may go through the customary process of transferring parish membership. All children baptized in these parishes will become part of the ordinariate, and male children will be eligible for the priesthood, even after marriage, with the customary training and review.
In the current Novus Ordo culture, it is only natural to expect a growing number of Catholics to cross over to either Latin Traditionalism (via the Traditional Latin Mass) or English Traditionalism (via the Anglican ordinariates). IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. The only question is how much and how many? This will continue until the general Roman Rite parishes return to their historic tradition. Until then, it is likely these Anglican Catholic parishes will grow far beyond what anybody expects in North America, the British Isles and the rest of the English-speaking world.
I should also point out that the ordinariates will not be limited to the English-speaking world, as Traditional Anglicanism can be found in such places as Latin America, Africa and India. Anglican mass is celebrated in the vernacular languages of those areas as well. Likewise, a large percentage of these will be entering the ordinariates too. What we have here is the makings of a whole new rite within the Catholic Church, though it is not officially a rite yet, and Anglican Catholic priests are competent to celebrate both the Roman and Anglican form of the mass. Popularity of the Anglican ordinariates in non-English countries remains to be seen, but it will be something to watch as it develops.

19 comments; post here:
Yes, yes, and yes. You've got the picture. I hope that more see it as the plan unfolds during this year.
I think the Anglican ordinate is going to be the back door for restoring the Latin Mass. The last generation of cradle Catholics and crrent converts like me have never been exposed to the pre-VII church and it's customs. And very few of us have had any education in Latin. The AO will give people a chance to have ascess to the Latin heritage of the Church in a way and in a langauge that they will understand. this will enrage the liberals, because their Novs Ordo was supposed to be the way the Mass was to be understood in the langage of the people. The only problem is that 'da people' didn't like it. So they'll be up the creek without a paddle in the near future when 'da people' say bye-bye to the NO and say hello to the AO1
I am a cradle Catholic (under the age of 45) who does not care for the "novus ordo culture" as you call it. I would enjoy the ordinary form celebrated in a "high mass" style (like it is on EWTN or at the Vatican), but all my local parishes have the folk guitar, drums and flute mentality. My pastor only prays Eucharistic Prayer 1 on Christmas and Easter. Every other week he speeds through Eucharistic Prayer 2. In fact, in my parish, the liturgy of the word is a big production with lots of banal folk music. But the liturgy of the Eucharist is usually sped through as fast as possible to get the Mass done in under 50 minutes. And sadly, I have not smelled incense in 5 years.
I would like to try going to an Anglican use parish, but the question is, will there be one in my area???? There doesn't seem to be any plans for one as there are very few Anglican/Episcapalian churches in my state. So at the end of the day, it seems like the Anglican ordinariate may have very little to no effect. It would probably be easier and quicker to get a parish to celebrate the Extraordinary form on a regular basis, but as you say, the Latin could be a bit of a hurdle.
One other thing, I went to a site that reproduced the Anglican use Mass, and I read it. There are some things in it I'm a little uncomfortable with that seem too "protestant", such as the recitation of the 10 commandments instead of a penitiential rite where venial sins are absolved, and the protestant version of the Our Father (even though the Novus ordo also uses the protestant portion, it's not connected directly to the end of the Our Father). But overall, it does seem very beautiful and reverent, more so than the current translation of the NO. I think our only hope for an Anglican use Mass would be if there is a great influx of Anglican use priests, and they start coming into areas like mine to take over closed down or dying NO praishes as AU parishes.
Commenter 3;
if you wish to attend a wonderful mass that does not indulge in the bland and somewhat irreverent 1970's folk festival mentality, try the Marounite rite. It is another world! Beautiful, reverent, awesome, as priests and people are dedicated in one mind to our Lord and Saviour jesus Christ. yes, there is a bit of Aramaic, but don't let that be cause for upset, it is profound - as the partaker basks in the language spoken by Jesus when on this Earth - a heard Icon if one will. Your Local Marounite parish should provide at least one mass in English (rather than Arabic (masses are therefore in two languages; either Aramaic/English or Aramaic/Arabic). You'll still see a small yet healthy number of women of all ages wearing mantilla, scarf, hat or wrap and a viggorous, growing priesthood. Perhaps the Catholic Knight would like to provide some footage of a Marounite mass, in Arabic and English...Oh, and rather than the folksie 'Come as you are' passage before the Eucharist, there is a beautiful 'Bread of heaven' sung segment instead that focuses upon the Eucharist, not upon the people, so, the people and priesthood, as one, like spokes in a wheel, are all drawn to its centre, the Eucharist, rather than away from it (as happens in too many Western rite churches). The Lord's prayer isn't broken up either, and the amount of insence on sume days would make a die-hard woodstock veteran happy! I am a very very new entrant from EVangelical (Sydney) anglicanism, with a background as a Seventh Day Adventist for 21 years after my first 13 years in Sydney Anglicanism) who, at 40, is entering the Marounite rite of the Catholic Church. they get on average one Anglican per year in my parish alone. You don't need to be of Middle Eastern herritage or affiliated with the Middle East to join, and any Catholic of any Rite can attend and receive the Eucharist as a matter of course, no questions asked. If there are no good anglican Ordinariate churches in your area, investigate the Eastern rites, there are upwards of 14 of them...
Sarah,
Australia.
Anon,
Anglican Ordinariate missions are forming all over the world as we speek. If you are from the US or Canada, have a look at the forums in the Anglo-Catholic blog:
http://www.theanglocatholic.com/forum/
Write to Cardinal Wuerl that you want to be involved! In the next year, groups will be forming all over the place - keep your eyes open and make your desire known.
Also, the liturgy will likely be different from the current Anglican Use (BDW) - do not let that bother you.
Catholic Knight, I have a couple questions about the AU liturgy. First, is the AU Mass celebrated ad orientum, facing the people, or is it up to the individual priest to decide for himself how to celebrate it?
Second, is communion recieved on the tongue while kneeling, or is it up to the individual to decide how to recieve? (like at NO Mass, you have many take in the hand, others on the tongue, a few may kneel, most will stand and bow)
Third, do they have Eucharistic ministers or girl altar servers or the handshake of peace? Is thier liturgical music strictly traditional with organ, or do they have contemporary music with guitars, pianos, horns, drums, etc?
Fourth, someone mentioned there is no Confiteor/Mea Culpa in the AU. Is that true?
Finally, does the AU Mass have only an English translation of the Latin Roman Canon, or is there the 4 Eucharistic Prayers?
Thank you in advance for your answers.
Q: First, is the AU Mass celebrated ad orientum, facing the people, or is it up to the individual priest to decide for himself how to celebrate it?
A: The Anglican Use Mass is celebrated almost exclusively ad orientem (toward the Lord and away from the people). I suppose it is canonically possible for an AU mass to be celebrated ad populum (toward the people) but I've never seen it done. Most Anglican Use Catholics are staunch traditionalists when it comes to the liturgy and don't like innovations. So ad orientem is the norm, and I've never seen it any other way.
Q: Second, is communion recieved on the tongue while kneeling, or is it up to the individual to decide how to recieve? (like at NO Mass, you have many take in the hand, others on the tongue, a few may kneel, most will stand and bow)
A: Communion at the AU Mass is served on the tongue while kneeling. Period. Exceptions are made only for physical handicap.
Q: Third, do they have Eucharistic ministers?
A: No.
Q: girl altar servers?
A: No
Q: or the handshake of peace?
A: No.
Q: Is thier liturgical music strictly traditional with organ, or do they have contemporary music with guitars, pianos, horns, drums, etc?
A: The AU mass uses traditional music with an organ. Some of the music is chanted without an organ, and all of the hymns are old. Most of this is done in Old English, with occasional Latin, and Greek for the Kyrie.
Q: Fourth, someone mentioned there is no Confiteor/Mea Culpa in the AU. Is that true?
A: No. The arrangement of the Anglican Use Mass (AUM) is different than the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) and follows the old Sarum Rite in some places. In the case of the Mea Culpa, the form and timing is a bit different, but as you can see below, no less efficacious. According to the Anglican Use, the Mea Culpa is divided into two part, the Kyrie at the beginning at mass, and the other more profound portion comes after the Creed and just before the Eucharistic liturgy. This second part of the "Penitential Rite," comes later than what we see in the Roman Rite, which explains some of the confusion. It's often missed if you're just glancing over the liturgy or not paying attention. It's starts with some prayers from the priest, and then concludes with the whole congregation reciting the following together...
"Almighty God, Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, maker of all things, judge of all men: We acknowledge and bewail our manifold sins and wickedness, which we from time to time most grievously have committed, by thought, word, and deed, against thy divine Majesty, provoking most justly thy wrath and indignation against us. We do earnestly repent, and are heartily sorry for these our misdoings; the remebrance of them is greivous unto us, the burden of them is intolerable. Have mercy upon us, have mercy upon us, most merciful Father; for thy Son our Lord Jesus Christ's sake, forgive us all that is past; and grant that we may ever hereafter serve and please thee in newness of life, to the honor and glory of thy Name; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen."
Q: Finally, does the AU Mass have only an English translation of the Latin Roman Canon, or is there the 4 Eucharistic Prayers?
A: The AUM uses Eucharistic Prayer I from the Roman Missal, which is identical to the prayer used in the TLM. Two forms of this prayer may be used, one is in contemporary English, and the other has been specially translated by Rome into Old English. This translation is preferred by most AU priests, because it is a special gift from the Holy See designed exclusively for the Anglican Use.
Thank you in advance for your answers.
You're welcome. If you would like to observe an entire Anglican Use Mass (AUM), you may do so here: http://video.yahoo.com/watch/5333606
I noticed in the AUM version of the penitential rite, Mary and the saints are not invoked to pray for us. Outside Eucharistic Prayer 1, are Mary or the saints invoked at all in an AU Mass, or is it a typical protestant point of view where "we just need the Trinity, we don't need Mary or saints or angels"?
Andrew, in his comments, said the Anglican Ordinariate liturgy will be different from the current AUM. IMHO it would be best if they replace the AUM penitiential prayer with an English translation of the TLM's Confiteor, and perhaps drop the protestant part of the Our Father.
It would be great if most cities had a choice of TLM, AUM, and NOM, but realistically, I think it will take several decades to get to that point. Eastern rite parishes are plentiful in many areas, but while thier style is much more reverent (and much more ethnic), the form and text of the Mass is identical to the NOM. With the AUM, it would be much closer to the TLM than the Eastern rite liturgies (as I see it, at least).
Anonymous,
In the Anglican Use mass the First Intercession after the Creed concludes with the words... "And we also bless thy holy Name for all thy servants departed this life in thy faith and fear, beseeching thee to be merciful and grant them fullness of joy in thy love and service; and to grant us grace so to follow the good examples of the Blessed Virgin Mary and of all thy saints, that with them we may be partakers of thy heavenly kingdom." This comes just before the second Penitential Rite. Then at the General Thanksgiving the following words... "Therefore with Angels and Archangels, and with the company of heaven, we laud and magnify thy glorious Name; evermore praising thee, and saying... " Finally, this is followed by the Canon of the Mass wherein we see the words... "United in one communion, we venerate the memory, first, of the glorious ever-Virgin Mary, Mother of our God and Lord Jesus Christ, of Joseph her spouse; as also of thy blessed Apostles and Martyrs, Peter and Paul, Andrew, (James, John, Thomas, James, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Simon and Thaddaeus: Linus, Cletus, Clement, Xystys, Cornelius, Cyprian, Lawrence, Chrysogonus, John and Paul, Cosmas and Damian) and of all thy
Saints; grant that by their merits and prayers we may in all things be defended with the help of thy protection. " followed by the words "vouchsafe to grant some part and fellowship with thy holy Apostles and Martyrs: with John, Stephen, Matthias, Barnabas, (Ignatius, Alexander, Marcellinus, Peter, Felicitas, Perpetua, Agatha, Lucy, Agnes, Cecelia, Anastasia), and with all thy Saints: within whose fellowship we beseech thee, admit us, not weighing our merit, but granting us forgiveness; through Jesus Christ our Lord..."
Yes, the Anglican Use mass is about as "Catholic" as you can get. However, Andrew is correct in his observation. The priests within the Anglican Use have been telling us for some time that the Anglican Use Mass (AUM) is NOT the final product, but rather a preparation for something more profoundly Catholic to come under the emerging Anglican ordinariates. We don't know what this final product will look like, but the resources the ordinaries will have to draw upon will give us a clue. The "Anglican Missal" is basically an Anglicized version of the Tridentine mass with just a few variations. The same could be said of the Anglican Breviary for the Office. It has been said that these texts will play a large role in the future Anglican Catholic liturgy. There is also the ancient Sarum Rite, which again is said will play a large role. So if we look at the current Anglican Use Mass (AUM), which is profoundly "more Catholic" than the typical celebration of the Novus Ordo mass, we can safely imagine things only going uphill from there.
Although the Our Father is said without the hesitation at the end with the "protestant" words at the end, these words are also included in the OF Masses.
I don't think it is a big deal. It seems that so many both Anglicans coming in and Catholics are so critical of everything if it is not exactly like what their preference is. If the Anglican Use is going to bring their own patrimony, of course, there will be differences. The additional prayers are quite beautiful and the confession is very Catholic. I believe that some Catholic parishes leave out the Confiteor. In the present AU Mass Mary is mentioned several times more than in the OF Mass. In the Canon all saints are usually mentioned, in our OF only our pastor mentions all of them. The other priests don't. Also except for the pastor they use Eucharistic Prayers II, III, or IV, which are nothing more than what I recall in the BCP 1928. There is an old saying that Anglo Catholics are more Catholic than Catholics, at least this is true if we are referring to the OF Mass. We must remember that there is more to being Catholic than which liturgy is used. Although at this time we don't know if there will be more than one version of the Anglican liturgy, that would be my hope. We are talking about Anglicans from several countries who each have used different liturgies, some closer to the BCP, others to one of the Missals.
Well hopefully the apostate Anglicans and Orthodox continue to "come home" to the Catholic Church. Then they will be in unity with the Roman Catholic Church and the Holy Father, and no longer apostates.
However, the heretical Protestants are another subject.
God bless my fellow Catholics!
Servant of Rome,
I agree with your sentiments but not your terminology. I think you've got some of your terms confused.
An "apostate" is a person who has completely walked away from Jesus Christ all together, meaning he no longer believes in Christ and is therefore no longer a Christian.
A "heretic" is a Christian who's theology is "heterodox" (chosen belief) which is the opposite of "orthodox" (right belief). This is the category most Protestants fit into. They are heterodox (or "heretics" if you want to be blunt about it) but they are not "apostates" because they still believe in Christ.
Finally there are "schismatics." A "schismatic" is someone who is still a Christian and still has right beleifs (orthodox) but for whatever reason has separated himself from the Church. This is the category the Eastern Orthodox Christians would fall into.
We must pray to God for the return of apostates, heretics and schismatics back to the Church, but let's keep our terms straight while doing it.
In the AU Lectionary, could you please tell me do they use the NAB, the Douay Rheims, or the RSV-CE?
RSV-CE is the preferred lectionary text for the AU liturgy as it stands right now. AU parishes probably would like to use the Douay Rheims, or something conparable, for high church liturgies, but that is a matter that would have to be worked out with the bishop.
I don't think that when the Ordinariates are established and the AU parishes are part of it, the bishops will have input into which lectionary text will be used. The decisions on the liturgy will be in the hands of the Anglicans in the Ordinariate and the CDF and Rome itself.
When the Anglican Use was first established the incoming priests really had little say so in such matters, but I think that now it is entirely a different situation.
At this time no one even knows if there will be one or more accepted Anglican Use liturgies approved.
I have it on good authority that the currently established Anglican Use parishes WILL MOST CERTAINLY become part of the ordinariate and issues such as the liturgy and lectionary will be settled immediately thereafter. The first solution will be temporary and will probably involve a plurality of accepted liturgies so long as the Roman Canon is used for consecrations. A more permanent unified liturgy will follow later.
Sir Knight,
Do you know if they will be using one of the Anglican Missals? The AU liturgy already uses the Canon of the Sarum/Gregorian completely, not the shorter version of the Roman Canon used in the OF Masses.
I am sure there will be some unhappy Anglicans whatever the liturgy turns out to be, as each group and even individual Anglican have their own desires on the end result. Of course I would choose one of the Anglican Missals, including the Gregorian Canon that follows closely with the TLM liturgy.
"All children baptized in these parishes will become part of the ordinariate, and male children will be eligible for the priesthood, even after marriage, with the customary training and review"
so that means that, e.g. if i baptize my son in an anglican catholic parish, and he gets married and then he discerns that God's calling him to be a priest, then with the right training and the recommendation of the clergy, he can become a priest,even though he's married????
Belen,
While every married candidate to the priesthood will be reviewed by Rome on a case by case basis, I believe the premise of your question is correct. If you baptize your son in the Anglican ordinariate he will automatically become part of the ordinariate and hence an "Anglican Catholic.". This automatically makes you eligible for membership in the ordinariate as well because you will have an immediate family member within the ordinariate. In addition to that, when your boy is grown, and even if he is married first, should he discern a vocation to the priesthood, he will be allowed to apply for seminary and ordination within the ordinariate. His acceptance and ordination will depend on Rome of course, as his case will be reviewed as a married man, and the final decision rests with Rome, but yes he may make the application.
Post a Comment