THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: I cannot begin to describe in words the absolute fundamental transformation that is underway in world politics. The mainstream news media is only now just beginning to comprehend the magnitude of a small fraction of it. Nothing this profound has happened since the fall of the Soviet Union. Not even the terrorist events of 9-11 compare to what is happening now. This is nothing short of a worldwide paradigm shift, and it's only just begun.(WND) - Islamists, in particular the anti-Western Muslim Brotherhood, seem poised to take power throughout the Middle East as a result of riots that have already toppled one Arab regime and are threatening others, in what some are calling only the latest wave of an Islamic "tsunami" sweeping the globe.
Riots in Egypt marked the turning point in the current paradigm shift.
In Egypt, members of President Hosni Mubarak's family reportedly have fled the country as a flood of violent, fatal street protests threatens the stability of this most populous Arab nation, a longtime U.S. ally and the only Muslim nation with a long-lasting peace agreement with Israel.
The White House has been championing the protests, calling for a transition to democratic rule in Egypt, where the Muslim Brotherhood formed the main opposition to Mubarak....
read full story here
The riot-revolution in Egypt is just the beginning. Tunisia has already fallen. Yemen and Jordan are next. Turkey has changed it's political course to a more anti-Israel and anti-Western stand, so as to appease the swelling outrage in the hope of preventing riots. Saudi Arabia and the Arab Gulf States are becoming increasingly isolated. Even their regimes will likely become vulnerable in the months and years ahead. Blame is steadily being painted on the United States and Israel, and sadly, it is not entirely unwarranted.
Allow me to elaborate on exactly what is going on. To understand it all, we need to back up a bit. Let's go back to 1979. Islamic radicals orchestrated a riotous revolution expelling the American backed Shaw of Iran, and replaced his monarchy with an Islamic theocratic republic. Ever since then, Iran has become a thorn in the side of the whole Western world, and especially the United States and Israel, orchestrating and funding Islamic terrorism by working with Syria to take over the only Christian nation in the Middle East - Lebanon. From Lebanon, Iran through Syria has created the terrorist organization Hezbollah. The sworn goal of Hezbollah is to drive the State of Israel into the sea. Furthermore, Iran has recently pursued nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them via intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICMs). In response to the 1979 terrorist kidnapping of American embassy workers in Iran, the United States backed a rogue dictator in Iraq named Saddam Hussein. Washington DC orchestrated the transfer of weapons - even chemical weapons - to Hussein for use in his war against Iran. While at the same time Washington (during the Reagan administration) attempted to play both sides of the Iraq-Iran War by delivering arms to Iran as well. It was only after Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons on his own people that the United States stopped all military relations with him. It was at that time Hussein decided the real enemy was the Untied States and the Gulf Arab states. So he signed a peace treaty with Iran and turned his guns south toward Kuwait instead. In August of 1990 Iraqi troops invaded Kuwait - a U.S. ally and oil producer for American markets. Kuwait fell quickly and Saudi Arabia realized it was next on Hussein's black list. So the United States responded with the Gulf War, which ended in February of 1991 with the defeat of Saddam Hussein, the containment of Iraq, the liberation of Kuwait, and the presence of a permanent U.S. military base in Saudi Arabia.
Now let's fast forward ten years to the turn of the century. On September 11, 2001, the United States was brutally attacked by Islamic terrorists. The devastation in New York, Washington DC and Pennsylvania rightfully enraged the American people. Osama Bin Laden, a Saudi Arabian national, and American-educated radical Sunni Muslim of the Wahhabi sect, orchestrated and funded the terrorist attacks through his international terrorist organization called Al Qaeda. The attacks on the United States were celebrated in many places throughout the Middle East, and other Islamic nations, because of what many Muslims perceive as the American backing of Israel and Arab dictators. Osama Bin Laden himself cited American backing of Israel, along with the presence of an American military base in his homeland of Saudi Arabia. As a radical Islamic puritan, Bin Laden saw such American presence as profaning holy ground so close to Mecca. In response, the United States, headed by President George W. Bush, formulated a "War on Terrorism" under which the United States invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, attempting to set up democracies. In both cases democracies were organized, but they were Islamic democracies that continued to enforce various elements of Shariah Law, and are extremely vulnerable to the kind of political pressure that can push them into becoming Islamic theocratic republics like Iran. In this new "War on Terror," as it came to be called, the United States continued to back dictators in multiple Islamic nations including Egypt and Pakistan due to their assistance in combating Islamic terrorism. Simultaneously, the United States embarked on continued deficit spending to back the "War on Terror" and increased social programs, as well as bolstering economic growth by inflating a government backed credit bubble.
Now let's fast-forward ten years to today. The government backed credit bubble popped in September of 2008, as a result the United States bailed out the banks and lenders with trillions of dollars of deficit spending. The U.S. Federal Reserve floated this debt by monetizing it with trillions of dollars of printed funny money. This injection of liquidity into the international markets caused inflation in the international markets, driving up the cost of food, energy, textiles and increasing poverty throughout all nations that use the dollar as their international trading currency. These conditions hit the Middle Eastern nations hard, especially those that worked closely with the United States, causing food riots that escalated into full-blown political revolutions - Tunisia, Yemen, Egypt and and now Jordan. There doesn't appear to be any end in sight. On the surface, the riots and demonstrations are understandable. These people have been victimized by governments that have failed them and left them hungry and in poverty. The problem with these revolutions is that radical Islamic groups have stood ready for years, poised to rush in and direct such movements toward the creation of more radical Islamic theocracies. The momentum seems unstoppable now, and there is nothing the United States (or any Western power) can do to influence it. The more the United States tries, the more frustrated civilians turn toward radical organizations such as the "Muslim Brotherhood" in response. Again, who can blame them? The United States backed many of these dictators that brought this ruin upon them in the first place. Why on earth would they trust us?
To make matters worse, Washington has been attempting to play both sides again, by backing the rioters as well as the dictators they are rioting against. Your guess is as good as mine as to why we would do this, but apparently we did, especially in Egypt. Maybe this was to gain political capital with the opposition groups should such a revolution ever happen successfully. However, as it's playing out, whatever political capital we hoped to gain is being spent fast and the whole thing seems to be backfiring on us as it did with our backing of Saddam Hussein in Iraq during the 1980s.
Now the entire Middle East is erupting in revolution, and as soon as one domino falls the next will follow. What happened in Iran back in 1979 is now happening all over the Middle East in 2011 and it seems we are powerless to do anything about it.
From a Catholic perspective all of this was predicted centuries ago by our mystics and seers. In the years ahead more political strength will shift away from the United States and Europe toward radical Islamic powers. Together with Marxist radicals in Europe, they will eventually attempt the same kind of riotous revolutions there. What follows is what many Catholic mystics have called "The Chastisement" which will result in another paradigm shift that will bring about the last great era in Christian history before the rise of Antichrist and the Second Advent.

24 comments:
I hope you don't mind, but I just stole this. I agree completely with your view of the events of this week. We need to be filling the Confessionals and praying.
So your saying that this shift will cause the great tribulation and the rise of the anti Christ to come sooner?
No. To understand what I'm saying you need to understand the timeline that has been laid out for us by Catholic prophecy.
1 first comes the period of Chastisement in two parts: the first part is worldwide social unrest eventually culminating in revolutions and civil wars in Europe. This chaos eventually results in the exile of the pope from Rome. Then comes the second part, which is Judgement sent by God in the form of a worldwide natural disaster. The disaster will have the effect of helping the Christians in their time of need, the rise of a Great Christian Monarch, and an era of peace and evangelism lasting an unknown period of time.
2 after the era of peace lasting an unknown period of time, then comes the period of Tribulation in which the world will fall into disarray again and that will be the period leading up to the Antichrist and the Second Advent.
I beleive the events we see unfolding now signal we are at the very beginning of the events described in the first period just before the Chastisement. The period of the Tribulation with Antichrist comes much later, after the last great epic of peace and evangelism of the Church lasting an unspecified amount of time.
That being said I should add a disclaimer. I am no prophet. I cannot know with absolute certainty that this is the time, but I do think it's a reasonable assumption considering the time, the prophecies and current events.
I have no idea how long it will take for these riots to reach Europe. It could happen in a year, or in thirty years, as the prophecies primarily pertain to Europe and do not specifically say how the radicals will come to power in the Islamic world, or how long it will take for them to reach power. When the Iranian Revolution happened in 1979 a lot of people thought that was the beginning of the Chastisement, but as you can see thirty years passed since then. Yes, everything has been progressing on course toward the events described by the prophets, just slower than everyone expected. What is happening now is much bigger than the Iranian Revolution though, and Europe is teetering on the edge of a massive economic crisis. Last I heard unemployment was 20% in Spain. So like I said, we may still be a long way off from the period of the Chastisement but it is reasonable to assume we are getting close - breathtakingly close.
Ok I really need to stop researching and reading into so many articles I come across someone told me that a church becomes apostate as part of a prophecy in the bible
Tabitha, many Evangelicals hold to this view namely because they already beleive the Catholic Church is apostate. Unfortunately for them, but very fortunate for us, they do not have all of the prophecies concerning the end times, so they leave a lot of things up to theory and guess work. We on the other hand have a much more vivid picture of what is coming.
The Catholic Church will never go apostate. We have had false popes in the past, and we may have them in the future, and we've certainly had heretical bishops and priests, but the Catholic Church itself has never, and will never, go apostate.
The thing to do is KNOW your Catechism. Pick up a copy now and study it. That way you can never be led astray by false teachers. Rest assured that the Church will always remain until the end of time, as Jesus promised, and there will always be a legitimate pope even in those rare times when we don't know who he is or an imposter occupies the Vatican.
The good news is we haven't had an antipope in a very long time and if ever one should come in the future he will likely only be able to deceive Catholics who have never studied their faith. Again this will be difficult because catechisms are so widely available. There are always a number of Catholics who never bother to study their faith, and they are always the ones most easily deceived, but you don't have to be one of them.
This is an amazing time to be alive. Lord help us to bring many souls to salvation in Christ and the one true church.
The Catechism has been an invaluable resource in anchoring my faith and understanding of the church.
Sir KNight, with all due respect, we must be VERY CAREFUL and circumspect in our readings of these "prophecies" which are, after all, private revelations, and not part of the depositum fidei. Christ gave very specific informatin about the "end times" Ye know neither the day nor the hour. In Mat 24 he spells out certain "signs" wars and rumors of war (which we have always had), nation against nation, roaring of the seas, etc. and of course the tribulation. Now, everyone and his uncle in the evangelical community has their own take on the rapture (totally unbiblical), the chastisement etc. There is some prot preacher named Howard Campion who has announced judgement day to be May 21, 2011. Christ warns us not to be deceived by false prophets or false christs saying "Behold he is tere, or there..._" What the catholic needs to do is pray, go to mass and remain in the state of grace, for all things to fall into place. I am at least skeptical when it comes to these kinds of prophecies. We must wait and see. Pete Frey
So, I read your link about the Chastisement. And during the mysterious three solid days of dark a plague arises which kills at least over half of the Earth's population. Do you know if that plague will specifically be directed at the enemies of the Great Monarch? Like... Does the prophecy say it will be similar to the plague in Egypt that avoided the houses with lamb's blood over the door? I want to know if some of these events come to pass are Catholics immune to this plague or is it non-descriminatory?
Assuming the prophecies about the three days of darkness are accurate than nobody is immune from the plague. There will be many good martyrs who fall victim to it, according to the seers. The instructions given to Catholics are as follows....
1. When the plague comes go indoors and do not go out for three days.
2. Cover all your windows and lock your doors. Do not let anyone in.
3. Make sure you have at least one wax candle that has been blessed by a priest. It is the only light that will shine.
4. Have crucifix and rosary ready to pray that you be counted worthy to survive.
These are all the instructions given. Some prophets say the darkness will be cold, so it might be good to have blankets. Some say food will be scarce afterward, so it might be wise to have a food pantry well stocked, with food and drinking water.
This is all we know, and we do not know for sure what God really has in store. As Pete said above, these ate private revelations.
HI Catholic Knight,
We are suppose to travel to Israel in March and I am very nervous with all this unrest in the Middle East. What are your thoughts about travel to Israel during these times?
Thanks,
MIragemama
Sir Knight,
This is all very intruiging. But are the natural disaster and the plague two seperate events? When do they occur in the timeline? And if they are seperate events, will they both be non-discriminatory?
Sir Knight.
I must say I am in complete agreement with you. Myself and a few friends of mine have been seeing the coming disaster in Europe, wars, civil wars, genocides and tehnic wars, for some time now, and mostly agreed that aggression of antagonisment in the middle east would be a significent cause for it. I myself however always expected it to be a bit more...organised. Its hard to fight a zeitgeist. However we are not mystics, our own predictions are based on what we've seen while observing world trends (especially the ones in the arab world now), not by reading the prophecies, which we are woefully ignorent of yet are surprised so many other Catholics seem to have an in depth knowledge of these private revelations.
In any Event if this is the chastisement of prophecy, whether or not the Great Monarch appears afterwards, at least the failure of the current world order of things will be made apparent for centuries to come.
Stressing once again that we cannot know time tables, I think it is safe to say the events of the last couple weeks do signify a paradigm shift that will eventually lead to the coming Chastisement of God on the world, the fall of secular republics and the fall of secularism in general.
When the new world arises from the ashes of the old I think it's also safe to say that Secularism will have been relegated to oblivion. It will not rise again. The world will once again understand what the ancients understood all too well. Society cannot function without an underlying religious culture to prop it up, and it is the duty of the state to not only acknowledge that but encourage it. The governments of the future will most certainly have strong and obvious religious underpinnings. In Europe and the Americas, those governments will definitely be Catholic.
Sir Knight,
I am glad to see you write about the Chastisement. I will tell you though that modern Catholics will laugh and balk at the whole concept. These prophecies, I believe, were quite familiar to Catholics prior to VII. Since that time, the Popes have kept them quiet so as not to be "doomsday." I find this very unfortunate. Personally, I believe many modern Catholics will not survive simply because they don't see it coming. Many people I know are watching, waiting, and praying. While I cannot say when the Chastisement will fall upon us, I believe there is a general concensus among all people that "something big" is in the air.
I'm impressed! Going now, immediately, to add your link in my little blog.
Sorry, I am new here. But a query on a point regarding the Great Monarch....
I am confused upon a small point. I have read up significantly on the Chasisment and the Great Monarch.
I am confused, however, on the duration of the 'Era of peace.' The prophecies regarding what the era of peace will achieve seem at odds with the apparent short duration of the era of peace.
I have read Desmond Birch's book – which is excellent. But I have also found the Catholic sources for the prophecies online and they paint a different picture to Birch's talk of an extended period of peace.
I note the following...
All the prophecies make reference to the Great Monarch laying down his crown in Jerusalem at the very point of the arrival of the Anti-Christ. This indicates the time of peace lasts no longer than the life time of the Monarch. (Birch makes reference to one prophecy of his descendants but I can find nothing of this online.)
The saints are unanimous that the Anti-Christ immediately follows on the Great Monarch.
The religious order the Monarch establishes is the last of it's kind. (Again, indicating short duration.)
Up to 25 years is mentioned directly – after which mankind forgets and turns to sin again.
In my reading it seems there is no room to believe the era of peace is of a long duration. It appears to be a last stab of restoration for the church, one last moment of grace before Anti-Christ.
It is as if the Church goes through Chastisment, breathes for 25 years, and then hits Anti-Christ.
Therefore, much as I would want to, I see no sign that the era of peace is of an 'extended duration' as Birch suggests. It seems to be 25 years and time up!
But I wonder if I am missing something. The only prophecy to suggest a long duration is the Venerable Bartholomew Holzauser who makes reference to the sixth age.
"It is in that age that the relation of the sixth Spirit of the Lord will be known, that is to say the Spirit of Wisdom that God diffuses over all the surfaces of the globes in those times. For men will fear the Lord their God, they will observe the law and serve it with all their heart. The sciences will be multiplied and complete on the earth. The Holy Scriptures will be unanimously understood, without controversy and without the errors of heresies. Men will be enlightened, so much as in the natural sciences and in the celestial sciences. "
Now 25 years does not an age make. I mean, to read the prophecies of the age of peace it's more like there is a brief interrupt in between Chastisment and anti-Christ.
Also, the amount that has to happen in those 25 years seems too much.
So I am confused. Reading Holzauser it seems there is an AGE of peace after Chastisement. But reading everyone else, well, I quote...
Blessed Maurus Magnentius Rabanus
Our principal doctors agree in announcing to us that towards the end of time one of the descendants of the kings of France shall reign over all the Roman Empire; and that he shall be the greatest of the Empire; and that he shall be the greatest of the French monarchs, and the last of his race.
After he has governed his kingdom he will go to Jerusalem, and lay down his Sceptre and Crown on Mount Olivet. Thus shall come the end of the Christian Roman Empire.
St Anselm
One Frankish king shall posess the Roman Empire in its entirety. He will be the last and perfect Emperor of Roman and Christian Empire. As soon as he lays down his sceptre and crown (according to the doctors of the church) the antichrist will come
St. Hildegard
"Peace will return when the Lily ascends the Throne again. The land will be very productive
During this time weapons will be forbidden. Iron will only be used for agricultural tools. In this period the land will be very productive. Jews, heathen and heretics will join the church.
The throne of the last catholic Empire will crumble and the sceptre will fall out of the hand of him who sits on the throne. The Great Monarch by this time will be a very old man. All justice will cease and will be trodden under foot. The latter times will be more evil and corrupt in the eyes of God. Children of God will be persecuted by the most hateful means in the eyes of God. Almost immeadiately after the death of the Monarch comes antichrist
And there is more. It seems to me that the era of peace, far from being an 'extended' era of peace is actually a short respite in which the Church is renewed to face the Anti-Christ.
Have I gone wrong here? Or am I reading it right? The consensus seems to be that the restoration of the Church is incredible but short lived.
One of the reasons why I tend to subscribe to prophecies from approved Catholic Saints and Blesseds is because they often follow a similar pattern as Biblical prophecy. By that I mean they follow the idea of immediate urgency. No period of peace and prosperity is claimed to last long. There is always something bigger around the comer until Christ returns. Now the purpose of this kind of writing style is to keep up always ever vigilant.
In regards to the time period of peace it seems impossible that anything really productive on a worldwide scale could happen in just 25 years. The lifetime of the monarch doesn't seem long enough either, and then we have that lone mention of the monarch's successors. I think when the prophecies talk about the Great Monarch they are talking about his office and succession more than the actual man. The first Great Monarch will be known simply as the "Great Monarch," and the second will be known as the same, and the third and so on. The "Great Monarch" is the "Great Monarch" whether he is the original or a successor. So the Great Monarch who lays his throne down in Jerusalam may actually be a successor of the original.
The idea behind this way of telling the prophecy is to insure that we DO NO KNOW when the era of peace ends, and so therefore we remain ever vigilant.
We must also remember that private revelation ALWAYS plays second fiddle to Biblical revelation. It is Biblical prophecy we must always default to first, and everything else must be plugged into that context.
I understand completely I regard to private revelation playing second fiddle to Scripture! And, also, the teaching of the church! So rest assured, I am not playing fast a loose here.
You can trust me on that!! However, one cannot ignore the vast consensus of the saints across history so, knowing what I do know, I can't ignore it! :-)
Thanks for the info. I agree it makes sense to think of a claim but there are a couple of issues... forgive me for asking and take this at the level of intellectual discussion – cut and thrust, no more! :-) What happens, happens and it is a matter of maintaining faith wherever you are planted.
But, if I may try your patience... A succession makes sense but consider these two words...
Blessed Maurus Magnentius Rabanus:
Our principal doctors agree in announcing to us that towards the end of time one of the descendants of the kings of France shall reign over all the Roman Empire; and that he shall be the greatest of the Empire; and that he shall be the greatest of the French monarchs, and the last of his race.
After he has governed his kingdom he will go to Jerusalem, and lay down his Sceptre and Crown on Mount Olivet. Thus shall come the end of the Christian Roman Empire.
This speak of "he" – not the title. And he is the last of his race, implying no descendants. And straight after comes the anti-Christ.
Adso The Monk:
"Some of our teachers say that a King of the Franks will possess the entire Roman Empire. This King will be the greatest and last of all monarchs, and after having prosperously governed his kingdom he will come in the end to Jerusalem and he will lay down his scepter and his crown upon the Mount of Olives. This will be the end and consummation of the Empire of Rome and immediately afterwards Antichrist will come"
He is the last of all Monarchs. And, again, the style of writing, the language, appears to be speaking of the man, not the title. If it was a reference to the title it would be "The King." But the text reads, "THIS King." Big difference. (And I live in the United Kingdom so I know a bit about Kings!)
La Salette France:
The new rulers will be the right arm of the holy Church, which will be strong, humble, pious, poor, fervent, and a perfect imitator of the virtue of Jesus Christ. The Gospel will be preached everywhere and men will make great progress in the faith because there will be union between the workers for Jesus Christ and all who live in the fear of God.
"But this peace will not last for long; twenty-five years of plenty will be almost forgotten and the sins of men will be the cause of all the punishment which will once again be meted out to Earth.
Twenty five years is mentioned specifically.
There is more. The number of Popes ascending is mentioned – 3 – before the arrival of Anti-Christ which ties in exactly with the arrival of Anti-Christ and the Great Monarch dying an old man.
I can reconcile the exception in terms of descendants being those who rule post the Anti-Christ. But it does SEEM that the era of peace is very short.
UNLESS I am missing something. But it seems hard for me to deny what I read... but I am open to further info.
I will say, by the way...
The promise of Fatima does imply an era of peace which suggest more than 25 years. And... after over 100 years of trail for the Church, it seems a bit unbalanced for God to allow no more than one generation before up pops anti-Christ! One the scales of justice it seems a little, well, unfair. :-)
Much obliged for the helpful comments thus far and I thank you for your patience.
Odd. My first post did not go through. That is the second part above! First part is here!
Sorry about that!
I understand completely I regard to private revelation playing second fiddle to Scripture! And, also, the teaching of the church! So rest assured, I am not playing fast a loose here.
You can trust me on that!! However, one cannot ignore the vast consensus of the saints across history so, knowing what I do know, I can't ignore it! :-)
Thanks for the info. I agree it makes sense to think of a claim but there are a couple of issues... forgive me for asking and take this at the level of intellectual discussion – cut and thrust, no more! :-) What happens, happens and it is a matter of maintaining faith wherever you are planted.
But, if I may try your patience... A succession makes sense but consider these two words...
Blessed Maurus Magnentius Rabanus:
Our principal doctors agree in announcing to us that towards the end of time one of the descendants of the kings of France shall reign over all the Roman Empire; and that he shall be the greatest of the Empire; and that he shall be the greatest of the French monarchs, and the last of his race.
After he has governed his kingdom he will go to Jerusalem, and lay down his Sceptre and Crown on Mount Olivet. Thus shall come the end of the Christian Roman Empire.
This speak of "he" – not the title. And he is the last of his race, implying no descendants. And straight after comes the anti-Christ.
Adso The Monk:
"Some of our teachers say that a King of the Franks will possess the entire Roman Empire. This King will be the greatest and last of all monarchs, and after having prosperously governed his kingdom he will come in the end to Jerusalem and he will lay down his scepter and his crown upon the Mount of Olives. This will be the end and consummation of the Empire of Rome and immediately afterwards Antichrist will come"
He is the last of all Monarchs. And, again, the style of writing, the language, appears to be speaking of the man, not the title. If it was a reference to the title it would be "The King." But the text reads, "THIS King." Big difference. (And I live in the United Kingdom so I know a bit about Kings!)
Many of the private revelations indicate a reign of 10 kings between the time of the Great Monarch and the time of the Antichrist. In fact, it is the Antichrist which is supposed to orchestrate a coupe against the King of Jerusalem, which is how he acquires his crown. The private revelations also seem to indicate the Antichrist will rule a great number of years, from Jerusalem, before he is finally revealed as the Antichrist. It is only during the last 3 1/2 years of his reign that the Church knows his true identity.
Again, when we look at Biblical prophecy we are confront with the exact same phenomenon. By the writings of the Old Testament it would seam the Messiah is supposed to come, suffer for his people, and then return as a conquering king IMMEDIATELY afterward. This led many Jewish scholars of the time to believe there might be two Messiahs. Of course, the apostles knew because Jesus told them. There would be a delay between his first and second coming, even though the Old Testament prophecies showed virtually no indication of this. That delay has now lasted nearly 2,000 years!
The same seems to be true about end times prophecies. The Biblical prophecies of Gog and Magog indicate a final battle between the Church and the powers of Russia toward the last days. The prophecies themselves seem to indicate a short and sudden battle. Yet the last 100 years of history tell us a completely different story. Russia made war against the Church for nearly a century, and the Church is still under the influence of this war, trying to emerge.
Switching gears to private revelation, we turn to Our Lady of Fatima, who once again warns us about the errors of Russia and her war against the Church. To the people of 1917 this might seem as if all this happens rapidly, but as we know now, it transpired over the course of nearly 100 years.
One possible way of interpreting the prophecy you mention is to say that the era of peace will last 25 years before people begin to forget their troubles during the Great Chastisement, and then sin will slowly creep back into society. The time after will be marked by a slow deterioration just as it always is in human history. The period of that deterioration may last for generations. Also we have to remember that some time during that deterioration, the worldwide empire of the Great Monarch will be divided into ten regional kingdoms. Who knows how long those ten kingdoms will last before the Antichrist gains his crown over Jerusalem.
The danger we run into with all of this stuff is getting to strict with our interpretations. That was the error of the Pharisees. They thought they had all the prophecies of the Messiah all figured out, when in fact, when the Messiah came, they could not even recognize him. They were blinded by their own knowledge. It wasn't that they were ignorant, it's just that so much of what they thought they knew was wrong. The lesson here is to not get too specific in the way we interpret prophecy. The important thing to do is step back and look at the big picture, and then let the details work themselves out. This "openness" to letting prophecy play out the way it wants to, without trying to force our own interpretations on it, prevents us from committing the error of religious pride in regards to prophecy.
Interesting, and very helpful –thank you.
I can see how that can work and I do agree that wooden interpretations of texts leads to much heresy.
I am reminded of Sister Lucie who was told she had to remain on early “A little time longer.” Eight years later!!
Do you have any references to the ten kings. This would be interest.
And, rest assured that I am not obsessive about this. It’s to do with a discussion I am having with a Protestant friend.
Cheers!
Post a Comment