Debt Crisis Is Designed to Push USA into NAU

The latest design for the flag of the NAU.

FLASHBACK 5-19-2006: (Human Events) - President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed....

read full story here

THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: Make no mistake about it, this current national economic and debt crisis is part of an overall agenda, and will be used as a catalyst to further advance the North American Union or "NAU." As the value of the dollar plummets in the months ahead, thanks to massive printing of dollars to pay for these "economic stimulus packages," healthcare overhaul and national deficits, the case for a new continental currency (the "Amero") will be pushed forward. As the Mexican government continues to collapse, the case for further Mexican integration with America and Canada will be pushed. The architects of the North American Union are right on track with their plan to eliminate American sovereignty, and if you think President Obama is going to do anything to stop this, think again, because if you believe that I've got a bridge I would like to sell you, along with some beach front property in Arizona.

With the end of American sovereignty within sight, the panorama of our 230+ years of existence as a free nation comes into question. What was it all about? If this is where things are going, why did America's Founding Fathers bother to rebel against the English crown in the first place? They say we did it for self government, but now we are about to hand over our independence to some imperial monstrosity of our own making - the North American Union. Was it all really worth it? Where do we go from here?

For now, it seems that all appeals toward American patriotism have failed, or have had only transient success, and indeed it would seem our own government is being intentionally wrecked to force this upon us. The more we appeal to our own independence and sovereignty, the more that independence and sovereignty is undermined. With a $14.5 trillion national debt, and an annual deficit of $1.5 trillion, the complete economic collapse of America is inevitable.  All the Tea Party Republicans can do now is delay it, but even that is questionable.  To prevent a default on the bonds that finance this debt, the government will print more dollars to cover the interest payments on the loan.  This will accelerate inflation, driving the value of the dollar downward.  Once our money is worthless, the push toward a continental currency will be extremely powerful. The argument will simply be made to accept the "Amero" or face breadlines. The Amero will be backed by gold, silver or some other precious metal with intrinsic value.  This will stabilize the currency, thus creating economic stability across the continent, with far reaching positive effects around the world.  I have no doubt in my mind that this generation of Americans, having never had to make real sacrifices, will cave in quickly once faced with this kind of a crisis.  The proposed solution will just be too irresistible.

The North American Union would essentially be a foreign power, artificially created, with no historical claim on anything American. Let us not kid ourselves either. The North American Union, like the European Union, is designed to be a smaller piece that fits quite neatly into a much larger puzzle of world government. By submitting to the North American Union, the United States would effectively be submitting to a larger world government later on.

Here is the problem.  There is, and always has been, big international cartels of business and bankers that sought to control governments with money favors.  Democratic Republics (like the United States for example) easily succumb to this temptation.  The reason why is because national election campaigns are VERY expensive, and candidates need lots of money to run them.  This is particularly true for campaigns involving the president of the United States.  There are only a few organizations that are more than willing to "donate" to such a cause.  Like good businessmen however, all they expect in kind is a good return on their investment.  Initially these sorts of things are worked out in the form of tax breaks, but of course there are bigger and better arrangements that can be made further down the line.  In today's world we have seen this manifested in the form of taxpayer funded "bailouts" for large international banks.  This is how it works, you see, this is the nature of democracy.  In a democratic system, the super-rich and powerful ALWAYS end up on top, while the average taxpayer gets hosed.  Now it is also true to say that the super-rich and powerful have always ended up on top no matter what form of government was in place.  Agreed.  However, under some forms of government there can be safeguards to keep the average taxpayer from getting hosed to the point where the taxpayer has no hope of ever getting a leg up.

The AmeroZone of the NAU
Merging Canada, America and Mexico
Similar to the EuroZone of the EU

One such system which offers hope to the taxpayer is monarchy.  Allow me to explain.  In a true monarchy, the king already has access to all of the material wealth and comfort he can imagine.  He also has access to all of the material power his country can produce.  This sets him up in a unique position, because you see he serves a lifelong term with absolute loyalty sworn to him by his chief military officers.  This system may seem archaic to the modern mind, but just because it's ancient doesn't mean it's foolish.  The ancients were not imbeciles.  Remember, the Greeks tried democracy and republicanism too.  It ended in failure for them, which is why they defaulted to monarchy.  The monarch system, as backward as it sounds to modern people today, is actually set up and designed to resist the influences of powerful money cartels. The monarch already has full access to every material thing his heart desires.  Therefore he cannot be bought.  He is already a world leader by virtue of the fact he rules a nation.  So he has power, and because his term is lifelong, his power is secure.  The cartel is left with little to offer him that he doesn't already have.  This frees him.  Under this system a nation's leader is liberated to do what is right rather than what is politically expedient.  Now that's not to say a king will always do what is right.  Sometimes kings have moral failures.  This is classically known as the "good king" verses "bad king" phenomenon.  However, even if the ratio of good kings verses bad kings were 50/50 it would still mean the right thing (justice) is getting done at least half of the time, which is a hell of a lot better than how often it gets done under a democratic republic, as we have seen in recent decades.  Fortunately however, a look at the panorama of European history tells us the ratio is much better than 50/50.  It's more like 80/20, which is to say for every ten monarchs, about two turn out bad, while the other eight turn out relatively good.  Historically speaking, the best way to deal with an international money cartel is with a monarch, who can stand up to it, if indeed he is morally competent to do so.  Not all monarchs are morally competent in this way, but most of them are.  Eventually the money cartel that controls the West will get so big and so powerful that the Western nations will have no choice but to revert to monarchy to reign it in.

That will be then, this is now, and for the time being anyway, democratic republics are the rule of the day.  So what we can expect more of, is more of the same.  The first thing we have to understand is that both socialism and capitalism are two extreme economic models designed to corral the West into the Servile State.  The Servile State is the point where the international money cartel and national governments become one in the same thing.  In many ways we are already there, but the cartel has bigger plans in mind.  The international Servile State will be created through sovereign debt, and it's not just the United States that will be captured by this debt crisis, but every Western nation in the world.  Never fret though, while the crisis is coming, the cartel has already provided the solution, and virtually all of the leaders are in place now to implement it.  The European Union is already established, and to keep it from crashing, the North American Union will soon be put into place.  After the NAU is created, other unions will quickly fall into place, or so the cartel thinks, that is until they run into the Islamic caliphate.  Right now, the "Arab spring" is being funded by the cartel.  The idea here is to knock down the monarchies, dictatorships and theocracies that control the Arab Muslims world.  They may be successful in knocking down some governments, especially those in North Africa, but they may run into some problems in Saudi Arabia and Iran.  Regardless of that, the Muslim Brotherhood and their ilk have other plans.

The Islamic caliphate will eventually be created.  This is the ultimate goal of the Muslim Brotherhood and other similar organizations.  Once that happens there will exist an Islamic "king" or "emperor" who will be able to stand up to the West's money cartel.  He will likely base his policies on Islamic law, not international monetary policy.  I suspect his reaction to their attempted control of him will not be pleasant.  It will be at this point when Israel and Europe find themselves in the fight for their lives.  Neither entities will survive the conflict in their present form.

So with this apocalyptic view of the near future, the question arises, what becomes of the late great United States.  This we cannot know.  The future of America is hidden from us.

For Catholics however, there is always a solution to our present woes.  The first thing we need to do is get back to our religion.  Strong religious families always survive the fall of nations.  Empires rise and empires fall, but the Catholic Church goes on, and those families who cling to her can expect to go on too.  Second, we must not be afraid.  By this I mean we must not be afraid to do what is right, according to the teachings of our faith, and live strong Catholic lives in spite of the world that hates us for it.  You see the best "revenge" is living well, so let us do that by living according to what our faith teaches, and in doing so our very existence will drive our enemies mad.  Third, we must network.  Only by drawing close to our fellow Catholics, and those Protestants of good will, can we hope to survive and thrive through the coming Servile State and the catastrophe that will soon follow in it's wake.