The U.S. Anglican ordinariate will be a welcome addition to the U.S. Catholic Church, and a necessary tool for Pope Benedict XVI's liturgical "reform of the reform." Traditional Anglicanism is modeled after traditional Catholicism, with a particularly Old English ethos called the "Anglican Patrimony." Essentially, Traditional Anglicans have much more faithfully preserved the liturgical traditions of pre-conciliar Roman Catholicism, even though they were outside the communion of the Roman Catholic Church. The Traditional Anglican mass resembles in many ways the traditional Latin mass. The language used is usually Elizabethan English. Imagine, if you will, a traditional Latin mass translated into English by Shakespeare. This would be very similar, though not totally identical, to the Traditional Anglican mass. The priest usually celebrates in the ad orientem posture, communion rails are common, women are usually veiled, and communion is always served on the tongue while kneeling. The emergence of Anglican ordinariate parishes around the United States will not only serve as a bridge for mainline traditional Protestants seeking full-communion with Rome, but they will also offer general Roman Catholics a viable alternative to the typical Novus Ordo mass celebrated in the usual banal manner. The timing of the emerging ordinariate will coincide with the reformed English translation for the ordinary form of the mass in the general Roman Rite. This will create a two prong pincer assault on the post-conciliar Novus Ordo culture. This combined with the pope's instruction on his motu proprio, creating a generous provision of the traditional Latin mass, seals the deal of reform. The Modernists have nowhere left to run. They can either conform to the Holy Father's "reform of the reform" or they can leave the Church for a more liberal schismatic sect.
![]() |
| Cardinal Donald Wuerl reported on the emerging ordinariate to the USCCB |
Traditional Catholics of the Extraordinary Form (traditional Latin mass) will find kindred spirits in the emerging Anglican ordinariate. Anglican Catholics, as they will be called, have a particular affection for pre-conciliar traditions and customs. They will become the natural allies to traditional Roman Catholics, even though they will retain many of their own unique characteristics of the English patrimony. We can expect to see a good amount of crossover of Traditional Catholics attending Anglican Catholic masses, and vice versa, with Anglican Catholics attending Traditional Catholic masses. This is inevitable. So it behooves both Traditional Catholics and Anglican Catholics to reach out and make contact with each other, build friendships and work together toward common goals. (Perhaps a joint-community picnic might be a good place to start? Wherein Traditional Catholics can "welcome" their new Anglican Catholic brethren.)
The Anglican Use Pastoral Provision was created by Pope John Paul II thirty years ago, and is in many ways a precursor to the new ordinariate template. Through the Anglican Use Pastoral Provision, priests from The Episcopal Church USA were able to convert to the Roman Catholic Church, and then receive holy orders even if they were already married. This special provision was considered an "Anglican Use of the Roman Rite." The ordinariate template is based on this. It is not a separate rite within the Church but rather a subdivision of the Roman Rite. Anglican Catholics will be under the same canon law and will use the same catechism as Roman Catholics. The canon of the mass will be identical to the general Roman Rite, but the rest of the liturgy will be based on the Anglican patrimony, which as I said above, bears striking resemblance to the pre-conciliar Roman liturgy. Again, I should point out here; it is not identical to the traditional Latin mass. There are differences. These differences have, however, a much greater continuity with the pre-conciliar Roman liturgy. In comparison to the Novus Ordo "ordinary form" mass, there really is no comparison. The Traditional Anglican mass is in continuity with the pre-conciliar liturgy, while the Novus Ordo mass is not, at least not as it's typically celebrated. The new reformed English translation will "help" the Novus Ordo, but it will not fix it. The Novus Ordo needs a make over, and indeed something like that will eventually happen, but probably not for a long time.
In the mean time, traditionally-minded Catholics can now find shelter in two places. The first of course is the traditional Latin mass communities spawned by Ecclesia Dei and Summorum Pontificum. Assuming a traditional Latin mass community exists in the area, and assuming this community is not being suppressed by the local diocesan bishop, than traditionally-minded Catholics will be able to find refuge there. However, in such cases where a traditional Latin mass community is not formed, or is suppressed by an unfriendly bishop, than traditional-minded Catholics may still possibly find refuge in an Anglican ordinariate parish.
Unlike the traditional Latin mass communities, the Anglican ordinariate communities will not need to rely on the friendliness of the local diocesan bishop. Anglican ordinariate missions and parishes can be erected with or without a local diocesan bishop's approval. While the U.S. Ordinary for Anglican Catholics will of course seek cooperation and feedback from the local bishop, permission for the creation of a group is not required. Between the Latin mass Catholics citing canon law that requires a bishop to provide a traditional Latin mass, and Anglican Catholics creating new traditional-style parishes nearby, unfriendly Catholic bishops are going to find themselves between a rock and a hard place.
![]() |
| Elevation during the Anglican Use mass |
So begins the Pope Benedict's "reform of the reform" in the United States.



17 comments:
The Anglican Catholic parishes may use the Roman Mass (in both its ordinary and extraordinary forms), as well as the Anglican Use Mass.
Please pray that an Anglican ordinate will open up in the Peoria, Il area soonn. We have a lot of disaffected Anglicans in this area and an AO would be a wonderful thing for us.
I watched the coverage on EWTN, and a question from one of the bishops concerned me. He asked if a Latin rite Catholic were to go to an Anglican Use Mass, and decide he liked it and wanted to join that parish, would the bishop have to tell that person they can't. Cardinal Wuerl's response was that it would be OK as long as it didn't become widespread among Latin rite Catholics. So if a few individual Latin rite Catholics here and there join Anglican Use parishes, it's OK, but if there is widespread joining, as you are hoping for, then the bishops would put a stop to it.
Let us pray that a new cultural appreciation of beautiful architecture, music, and ritual returns to the Catholic tradition.
So-called modern buildings that have no sense of beauty or the scared, like the Liverpool, Los Angeles or San Francisco "Cathedrals," should be sold off as office space.
Sir Knight:
I really appreciate your C.K. Blog site and am rather disappointed that you plan to eventually stop blogging. Please don't ever take the site down. It's an invaluable resource that needs to stay available for future reference, as you have a gift for putting issues into words. That being said, all this talk about the Anglican Ordinariate, N.O. mass, Extraordinary form, etc., is lost on 95 percent of the general church-going Catholic population. I hate to sound cynical, but most of them wouldn't know the difference between a N.O. mass and a Traditional Anglican mass or a head of lettuce. The amount of Catholics who don't even realize they don't belong to a denomination, but rather to the Universal Church is astounding to me. They act as if there is really no difference between a Catholic, a Presbyterian, a Methodist, etc. and if they know there's a difference, they wouldn't be able to tell you what those differences are. Personally, I attend a Maronite rite parish, even though I'm a Latin rite Catholic. I've had it up to my Adam’s apple with the N.O. masses I've attended at the various parishes in my home town. Perhaps you're correct and with the Reform of the Reform, things will get better. Let's hope so. Thanks! and keep up the great work. Jaymes
Dear third anonymous,
What I see going on here is a lot of political posturing on the part of Cardinal Wuerl. Don't mistake this for a disparaging remark, because it's not. Rather it's just an observation. There are a few things everyone needs to stop and take note of.....
1. Cardinal Wuerl's role in this whole process is temporary. In fact it's technically over already. By fall of this year he will be completely out of the loop and on to other projects not related to the ordinariate.
2. Cardinal Wuerl's roll in this process is purely diplomatic. He has no administrative authority over the formation of the ordinariate.
3. Cardinal Wuerl's roll in this process is political, in the sense that it is his assigned JOB to make sure this ordinariate gets started in the USA without any resistance from the American bishops.
All that being said it helps to explain things. Wuerl has demonstrated a profound lack of understanding of not only how the ordinariate is designed to work, according to the Apostolic Constitution, but also how the current Anglican Use works under the Pastoral Provision. Guess what? That's okay. Because it's not his job to know and understand those things. He is only required to have a minimal knowledge because as I said above his roll is temporary, diplomatic and political. That is all. He doesn't need to have extensive knowledge, nor should we expect him to.
What I see going on here is a whole lot of political posturing on Wuerl's part. He has been given the job of selling this thing to the American bishops so the pope doesn't have to deal with a revolt. Wuerl himself is a left leaning bishop, so he is most suitable for the task, since 99% of the opposition will naturally come from liberal bishops. What I've noticed in everything coming out of Wuerl's office is a tendency to interpret Anglicanorum Coetibus in the most restrictive way possible, even to the point of contradicting one point of the Apostolic Constitution against another. I believe this is intentional. I believe what Wuerl's office is trying to do is make this whole ordinariate thing sound so potentially tiny and exclusive that it couldn't possibly present a threat to the liberal American bishops. Of course this is by design to make the whole thing more palatable to them, so as to sooth their fears and coax their cooperation.
Now in regards to Roman Catholics joining Anglican Catholic parishes we have to remember that AC parish membership is different from AC ordinariate membership. Anyone may become a member parishioner of an AC parish, but to get under the ordinariate (episcopal oversight) you have to follow the rules of the Apostolic Constitution. My advice is this. Read Anglicanorum Coetibus yourself. Things will be run pretty much at face value of what it says, not by what Wuerl says, and not by what any other Roman bishop says. The Apostolic Constitution is the final authority on the ordinariate - period.
No, there will not be a mass exodus of Roman Catholics to Anglican Catholic parishes. That's not practical and it's not even likely. However, some will come over, and that is certain. The bishop cannot stop them from doing this. If he does he violates canon law because AC parishes are equal to RC parishes. The only thing a bishop can do is attempt to block RC members from transferring out of his diocese into the ordinariate - thus leaving his episcopal oversight. Even then he is still limited by canon law and the norms of the apostolic constitution. However, I would venture to say that 90% of RC's who join AC parishes will have no need to transfer to the ordinariate. It's more or less just a paperwork thing anyway, and 90% of the time it will be unnecessary. An RC can get everything he could ever want just out of his AC parish membership, and would likely see ordinariate membership as an unnecessary hassle. Only rarely will that be the exception.
Jaymes,
Thanks for the blogging encouragement.
Yes, you're probably right in your observation. That is yet another reason why there will not be a mass exodus from RC parishes to AC parishes. There are people in my diocese who will never attend an AC parish simply because it's "Anglican" in nature and that is too foreign to them. They are naturally suspicious of anything not Roman, but the irony to that is a good number of RC priests and parishes are betraying their Roman tradition. So by not exploring AC parishes they may effectively be consigning themselves to a deprived Catholic experience.
That's neither here nor there though. If 99% of RC's never step foot into an AC parish it makes no difference. The very presence of a nearby AC parish will be a thorn in the side to any liberal bishop for the sake of the 1% of his flock that flees to their refuge. Again, RC bishops (regardless of their leanings) are still confronted with a priest shortage and will ultimately need to draw upon AC priests for backup. That means RC parishioners in RC parishes are going to get exposure to an occasional AC priest anyway, and that AC priest is going to do the RC liturgy correctly, with awe and solemnity. So it all pans out in the end. This combined with the reformed translation of the NO mass and coming reforms still yet to be released for the NO is going to make a significant change in the decade ahead. Like it or not, the average RC parish is in for some significant exposure to authentic Catholic tradition in the years ahead.
The Ordinariate is a great thing for traditional Anglicans who want to flee their dying denomination and come home to the true Church.
But I question the practicallity of the Anglican Use mass having any impact on the Ordinary Form in the way you elaborated. In reality, for your hopes (and fine hopes they are) to come to pass, there would need to be an Anglican Ordinariate parish at minimum in every major city in the US. At best, there would be one no more than a 60 to 90 minute drive for any Latin rite Catholic in the country.
But that seems unlikely. What will probably happen is there would only be a small number of states that would have only one Anglican Ordinariate parish each. That won't be nearly enough to have any influence on the Latin rite ordinary form at all. For the average traditional minded Catholic, it would be much easier to get one of thier local parishes to commit to having the Extraordinary Form.
Having said that, though, I found this website that has the text of the Anglican Use Mass. It is very beautiful and sacred, certainly more so than the current English translation of the ordinary form, although I find the new translation to be near equal. However, you have said in previous posts that the current Anglican Use Mass may not be the final Anglican Ordinariate Mass. This website also has the text of the Sarum Rite Mass, said to be an English Mass used prior to the British protestant revolt of Henry VIII. Having read the text, it is also very beautiful, and seems to be very similar to our Ordinary Form (almost like a OF/EF hybrid). Since the Anglican Use Mass, despite being adapted for Catholic use, still has some very protestant influences, could the Sarum Mass become the final form for the Ordinariate?
Love your take on this good news of the forthcoming Ordinariate.
I too love the Anglican Use Liturgy and am anxiously awaiting the new Liturgical Books that God willing, will come this autumn at the same time the new Novus Ordo Liturgy is officially released.
I do admit to having some angst over what changes there may be. Will it move even closer to Sarum? Will it retain Tudor English? I do hope for the best. From what little info I can squeeze out of people like Fr. Christopher Phillips, it will not disappoint.
I am no prophet and time will be the tell!
Matthew, I cannot tell you what I know about the forthcoming Anglican Catholic liturgy, nor can I tell you how I know it, but I can say you WILL NOT be disappointed. You'll just have to trust me on that one.
I've belonged to an Anglican Use parish for a number of years, and no one there has ever used the term "Anglican Catholic". I'm not sure why you feel the term will now be used.
One of the influences that our liturgy has had is that over the years a number of the seminarians have come to the parish and developed a love for the solemnity of the Mass. They will likely carry that with them when they are ordained for the Ordinary Form.
Daniel, the Vatican has used this exact term in reference to the groups of Anglicans that will enter the ordinariate. It has not used this term in an official sense, but in passing reference. I make no assertion that this will be used in an official sense in the future, but only that many people will inevitably use it, as some ordinariate-bound groups already are. It is simply a contraction of "Anglican Ordinariate Roman Catholics."
From my understanding in some of the larger AU parishes, there are many Latin Rite Catholics who are members. Their children are baptized there, so they have a legitimate claim to be part of the parish.
Although the Ordinariate will start out slowly, I believe that in the future we will see more and more AU parishs in all the states. Many Anglicans have been told outright lies by their priests (those in the continuing churches) about the Ordinariate, but as time goes by and their groups keep splitting off, and they have an opportunity to see how the AU parishes work, they will come over.
Also Pope Benedict has chosen more traditional Bishops to replace some of the liberal ones as they retire.
It is obvious that the Holy Spirit is the force behind the Ordinariates, not some Bishops or Cardinals.
So far nearly every city in the US will have an Anglican Use group. There are already two in the Metro DC area and a convent in Maryland. You can see a map here:
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&oe=UTF8&msa=0&msid=212341419291699523838.0004925c10d87d8eda828
How much of an impact they will have is of course unknown. I think that it will be somewhere between the Eastern rite churches currently in the US and the larger religious orders. I think that the impact will be more upon those who are interested in "higher" liturgy as the AU mass is much higher than the average regular Catholic mass. We'll see.
I think the biggest impact that the Anglican Ordinariates will have will be upon the other groups of Protestants looking to enter into full communion with the Pope. it shows a way forward for them. And it shows a way forward to recapturing the pre-Reformation liturgical diversity of the Church.
It also is another step away from parishes and dioceses rooted in geography. So much of our lives are not spent not with the people that we live next to but the people that we are connected to in a non-geographical way -- work, through Facebook, through a community of interest, through school friends who are not miles away. Communication and travel is so much easier now that our "next door neighbor" could live on another continent.
A couple of comments about this post from my experience, though the practices can vary from parish to parish:
- People are certainly better dressed with most men in a coat and tie but veils are not universal
- Communion is always given while kneeling, if there is a place to kneel, but it can be given to people while standing.
- But regardless of standing or kneeling, the communicants are also lined up before the altar, standing shoulder-to-shoulder and the priest and eucharist minister (the former with the "bread", the latter with the "wine") moves down the line or if there are two, from the outside edge to the middle. Yes, it's a lot of walking for the priests.
- You do not leave the altar rail, or the line, until people on both sides have had the chance to take both species. You don't want to disturb them with their movement.
- Communion can be given in the hand, while kneeling preferably, but it is given in a different way. Your right hand is over the left and you bring both hands up to your mouth. You DO NOT take it in your fingers. It only touches your skin once, in the palm of your hand as you bring it to your lips.
- When you consume the "wine" you are not in control of the chalice. The eucharist minister is. You might guide it your lips by lightly touching the bottom while the minster holds the "cup" and tilts it in. Remember you are kneeling and so your mouth is chest level of the minister.
I outline so clearly the various bits above because the in-the-hand versus on-the-tongue debate I find often to narrow and too simplistic. You can have communion in the hand that is much, much more reverent and moving than the current "bread line" with the priest standing still and you can have communion on the tongue that is not very reverent at all. Moving a bit closer to what I describe even if communion is in the hand would be an improvement. There is a lot of space, of ground, between the traditional on the tongue practice and the 60s bread line practice.
Also, I describe it because what I miss most, now that I am fully Catholic, is standing next to my loved ones taking communion. My wife and I have never stood next to each other in front of the altar since our wedding day. My fondest memory of Christmas Eve service in my Episcopal parish growing up is standing shoulder-to-shoulder with my brothers and mother taking communion. It's moving on Christmas to see families are lined up together at the altar, parents at the end and children between. To return to that would be an improvement and it does not require "giving in" to the on-the-tongue lobby. Indeed, personally, I care more about this -- about taking communion as a group lined up at the altar -- then about other parts of this.
Oh, and I also hate being passed the chalice like we are sharing a glass of wine at the bar. It is so common, so beneath the dignity of God.
OK, just one more comment, I promise. :)
If you want to get a pdf copy of the Vatican-aproved Book of Divine Worship (i.e. the Anglican Use liturgy) or want to see a video of mass as celebrated by an Anglican Use Catholic church, Our Lady of Atonement (in San Antonio), go to:
http://www.atonementonline.com/index.php
Best of luck with this as a mutually beneficial system. Indeed, you will benefit from the Anglican musical traditions which are far less "folky" and watered down than in the Catholic church. It was so sad to see how the music has evolved in the Catholic faith as well as some portions of the Church of England. Nonetheless, best of luck.
Post a Comment