"An Adult faith does not follow the waves of fashion and the latest novelties."
Pope Benedict XVI

Monday, October 24, 2011

Vatican Calls For World Bank?


THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: In what is sure to anger Laissez-Faire Capitalists, irritate international Socialists, and drive American Evangelicals hysterical; a small and obscure Vatican commission today released a non-binding and non-doctrinal proposal calling for the creation of a new global financial order, that would help to regulate and control the excesses and inequalities of the current world monetary system....
(CNS) -- A Vatican document called for the gradual creation of a world political authority with broad powers to regulate financial markets and rein in the "inequalities and distortions of capitalist development."

The document said the current global financial crisis has revealed "selfishness, collective greed and the hoarding of goods on a great scale." A supranational authority, it said, is needed to place the common good at the center of international economic activity.

The 41-page text was titled, "Toward Reforming the International Financial and Monetary Systems in the Context of Global Public Authority." Prepared by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, it was released Oct. 24 in several languages, including a provisional translation in English.

The document cited the teachings of popes over the last 40 years on the need for a universal public authority that would transcend national interests. The current economic crisis, which has seen growing inequality between the rich and poor of the world, underlines the necessity to take concrete steps toward creating such an authority, it said.

One major step, it said, should be reform of the international monetary system in a way that involves developing countries. The document foresaw creation of a "central world bank" that would regulate the flow of monetary exchanges; it said the International Monetary Fund had lost the ability to control the amount of credit risk taken on by the system...

read full story here
The document itself is likely to be ignored by leaders in the international community, especially in Europe and America, where large corporations and banks are content to leave things exactly the way they are. Not that it really matters, since the document itself is a single commission proposal, which is not part of the magisterial teaching of the Church.  It is simply a "note" from one office within the Vatican.  It carries no ecclesiastical 'weight' and is designed to be absorbed into a larger, more comprehensive, document later on.  The wording may be changed, and some portions may end up being deleted all together.  In other words, this 'note' is just a small flexible part of a much larger work in progress.

The contentious point of the document, receiving so much media fanfare, but so few direct quotes as to what it actually says is as follows...
A supranational Authority of this kind should have a realistic structure and be set up gradually. It should be favourable to the existence of efficient and effective monetary and financial systems; that is, free and stable markets overseen by a suitable legal framework, well-functioning in support of sustainable development and social progress of all, and inspired by the values of charity and truth. It is a matter of an Authority with a global reach that cannot be imposed by force, coercion or violence, but should be the outcome of a free and shared agreement and a reflection of the permanent and historic needs of the world common good.
This comes following the most honest assessment ever seen on the causes of the international financial/economic crisis that rocked the world in 2008 and continues with us today. The Vatican is attempting to lead other nations to own up to the fact that the current financial order is corrupt, and that current regulatory methods are not fixing the problem. If anything they are making them worse, and because of this, another financial catastrophe (far worse than 2008) awaits us in the near future.

The document released today emphasizes the need to follow the Catholic principle of subsidiarity. This means that problems should be dealt with from the bottom up, not the top down. It is consistent with the papal encyclicals of the last century, and in no way called for an authoritarian 'New World Order' as some have suggested. Quite to the contrary, the document calls for the voluntary creation of better financial/economic regulating authorities, which implies such things do not currently exist. That by definition excludes the International Monetary Fund (IMF) which is criticised directly, the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the United Nations. Clearly what the document calls for is something new and different, that is not based on the corrupted status quo. It gives no specific details beyond this.

The document IS NOT a call to a 'New World Order' or a 'Centralised Banking System.'   It is a call to a new way of regulating international commerce, but it is NOT a call to creating a 'One World Global Government.'  Sorry, conspiracy theorists, but you're hyperventilating over nothing.   If anything, the Vatican is trying to move the world AWAY from a centralised world tyranny.

Like Rerum Novarum in 1891, and all the papal social encyclicals since then, this is likely to be ignored by the leaders in Europe and America, to the detriment of the third-world and even middle to low income people in Europe and America themselves. (Right now it seems the only people hyperventilating about this are some conservative Catholics, Evangelicals and a few secular conspiracy theorists.)

Because our leaders have ignored papal teaching on social justice (or perverted it to suite their own template), the world will continue to languish in economic depravity, oscillating between the 'gods' of capitalism and socialism, until finally the whole thing implodes into a worldwide economic catastrophe. Only then, after the world has been left in financial ruin, will some wise European monarch take up the banner of the Church and actually begin to implement this stuff she has been preaching about for the last 120 years!

To understand this document, it must be put into the full context of a century of papal teaching. To interpret the document in a vacuum, as the news media often does, is to distort what it means. So what does it mean? Well you can read the document and decide for yourself. I've provided a link below to the full text. Before you do however, you need a primer on Catholic Social Justice. So here is the short-version gist of it...

Catholics cannot be Socialists. This is clearly taught by the Church. By the same token however, and perhaps in a more profound way, Catholics cannot be Capitalists either! (When I say 'Capitalists' here I mean the Austrian School of Economics embraced by Neoconservatives and Libertarians.) No honest reading of the Gospels, or the Church's social encyclicals, can produce a Socialist or Capitalist outlook. Both philosophies must be rejected by the Christian mind, or else bow to the altars of man we will, instead of the one true altar of Christ.

The Church has made her social teachings clear in both the Catechism and papal encyclicals. Great Catholic thinkers, such as G.K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc, gave us the philosophical framework for how to apply these encyclicals to modern economics. They called this new way of thinking DISTRIBUTISM, which was an outright rejection of Capitalism and Socialism. For if Capitalism is a wound on the proper economic social order, than Socialism is just a band-aid, and not a very good one at that. The economic social order must be reconstructed in the image of the Gospel, and while that will most certainly not produce a perfect world, it will most certainly make things better than they are. You can read more about Distributism at The Distributist Review.

Until then however, I do hope you will join me in thanking Pope Benedict XVI for his wise instruction through the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, and join me in storing the document in safe keeping until that day when a great monarch will one day implement it. We should do this while we prepare for the onslaught of mockery we will soon get from the Capitalist elite, the frustration we will hear from the international Socialists who will say it doesn't go far enough, and the hysterical "end of the world" rantings of American Evangelicals who will soon tell us the pope is the Antichrist. I have already read the ramblings of some bloggers and comments made on Internet forums. This document will certainly result in a whole new round of Anti-Catholicism in the Western world, particularly in the United States.

You can read the FULL TEXT of the Vatican document HERE.

26 comments; post here:

Catawissa Gazetteer said...

Apparently, you and I are the only two people commenting on this that have 1) read the actual statement and 2) understand the 2000 years of Church teaching that underlie it. The media got so excited with this perceived endorsement of all their Marxist dreams that they're toweling of and smokin' a cigarette right now.

The Catholic Knight said...

This is a predictable initial response by the national news media, and Marxists in general. They will rejoice until they learn the details, then they will lament in saying it doesn't go far enough.

I suspect the national news will report this as a Marxist document from Rome for as long as they can, until Rome finally corrects them publicly. That, however, will give plenty of time for the Capitalist elites in America to organise their attacks against it. I suspect we may be hearing about it negatively on FoxNews and even right-wing talk radio. Of course, this will only serve to further pit Evangelicals against Catholics, which is what the globalists in America always try to do anyway.

The problem here is that both Capitalists and Socialists like to take the teachings of the Catholic Church and frame them in their own narrow template. They operate on the presumption that there is either Capitalism or Socialism and nothing else -- period! They presume there can be no "third way" and that anything that attempts to create a "third way" is either a rehashing of Capitalism or Socialism. With this ridiculous mentality, these globalists have been able to enslave the minds of Americans into a view of the world that amounts to little more than tunnel vision.

Catholic Americans, and Non-Catholic Christians (Evangelicals, Pentecostals and Baptists especially), would do well reviewing the Distributist links I have provided above.

Catawissa Gazetteer said...

In my mind there is a single, pivotal sentence in the statement: "In the tradition of the Church’s Magisterium which Benedict XVI has vigorously embraced, the principle of subsidiarity should regulate relations between the State and local communities and between public and private institutions, not excluding the monetary and financial institutions."

The Church intends for the real power to stay at the local level, starting with the family. And that's the secret to success. However, most will gloss over this sentence and the ones that read it, because they are ignorant of Church social teaching, will not understand its significance.

Justin said...

Let me say, I agree with the basic aims, but there is a public-relations problem when we start advocating for a non-capitalist system. Most people are just reflexively hostile to anti-capitalist systems, since capitalism is synonymous with freedom. Um, and yeah, especially noxious when combined with internationalist Popery....

Distributism needs to be sold as capitalist reforms, not as a change of systems. For example, laws mandating profit-sharing with workers and laws limiting executive salaries would go a long way towards implementing the ideals of Distributism, without triggering the knee-jerk reactions against threatening ideological systems.

I would add that any system, which the Pope seems to be advocating here, that postulates a global governance system, well, that is a non-starter from the get-go.

Banking and finance ALTERNATIVES, YES... regulations and authorities, NO.

If the Pope was serious about an alternative international banking structure, he could do it tomorrow. Who but the Catholic Church is in a better position to establish it?

Brantigny said...

Oh Glenn Beck, arch heretic and Mormon metioned this on his show this morning about 11:55 EST. I klnew I could find the truth here. Of course anyone in the Evangelical frame will drop back to the old ploy of using a misinterpretation of the Revelation of John.

To them a one world religion is anathema, unless it is their religion.

Etienne said...

Where can I find a copy of the document mentioned in this article?

Catawissa Gazetteer said...

Here's the link:

http://www.oecumene.radiovaticana.org/en1/Articolo.asp?c=531752

The Catholic Knight said...

See above. Link was just added.

scotju said...

We don't need a one world bank. A one world bank will lead to a one world Anti-Christian government and religion.

Saponaria said...

When you say a Catholic can't be a Capitalist would you please define what you mean by Capitalist here?

Catawissa Gazetteer said...

Another quote from the document you won't see in the main stream press:

"What is valid on the national level is also valid on the global level. A person is not made to serve authority unconditionally. Rather, it is the task of authority to be at the service of the person, consistent with the pre-eminent value of human dignity. Likewise, governments should not serve the world Authority unconditionally. Instead, it is the world Authority that should put itself at the service of the various member countries, according to the principle of subsidiarity. Among the ways it should do this is by creating the socio-economic, political and legal conditions essential for the existence of markets that are efficient and efficacious because they are not over-protected by paternalistic national policies and not weakened by systematic deficits in public finances and of the gross national products – indeed, such policies and deficits actually hamper the markets themselves in operating in a world context as open and competitive institutions."

Saponaria said...

"They called this new way of thinking DISTRIBUTISM"

So while it might be based on Catholic social teaching it's not really been taught or put into practice for the last 2,000 years. So what would you say the CC has traditionally supported for the last 2,000 years? And could you quote any Church Fathers or Popes before the last 120 years condemning whatever it is you define as Capitalism? Surely you can understand that 120 years it not remotely impressive over the history of the 2,000 years of the Church.

The Catholic Knight said...

By Capitalism I specifically mean the economy as understood by the Austrian School, particularly in the way of Laissez-Faire deregulatory approach, wherein the Market becomes a morality unto itself.

The Catholic Church agrees that there should be a free Market, but that the Market cannot be truly free unless it is regulated by Christian moral principles -- Distributism.

Alan Aversa said...

I like how the CNS report says that the Vatican calls "for the gradual creation of a world political authority with broad powers to regulate financial markets..." That gives me hope, especially for developing countries, that we might be moving on from the contraception-pushing, baby-dismembering United Nations.

I would love to see the Vatican leading the world on this economic authority; the Church has at least 700 years of experience in economic theory—beginning with, e.g., bishop and physicist Nicole Oresme (d. 1382).

Dave said...

Scotju, above is correct. And who, pray tell, would run this "new political authority/bank?" Oh, let me see... How about Paul Volcker? Or Alan Greenspan? Or any of their European kin with stellar internationalist New World Order credentials. Of course, this new entity would be under U.N. auspices. That way, the UNFPA would just have to walk down the hall with a wheel barrow and haul off their cash to finance the NEXT country that dares to stand up to their anti-life crusade. It would be perfect!! Geez, Lou-eeze....

Young Canadian RC Male said...

Sir Knight, check out this link that Fr. Z on his blog posted:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/281099/catholics-finance-and-perils-conventional-wisdom-samuel-gregg

And Fr. Z himself rants on the "white paper":

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2011/10/the-new-white-paper-from-the-pont-council-justice-and-peace-fr-z-rants-like-loon/

Would you agree? disagree? Seems like this statement isn't magisterial and is not what it was being touted to be.

weaver said...

Thank you Sir Knight for your well taught out comments on this proposal,i have to admit i taught it was some sort of masonic conspiracy, when i seen the way romereports headlined it, i find romereports a very nwo run entity, so i left a comment slamming them for their headline spin of it, which did injustice to what is a very reasonable solution to the financial

Anonymous said...

Genetically, humans have it in their DNA to worship. Capitalism teaches man to worship the power of the free market (not that its ever been truly free) and socialism teaches us to worship the state. Only a return to true spirituality can such human tendencies to worship be turned to God rather than to the market or the state.

William a sinner. Most unlearned. The Least of all the faithful… said...

Has anyone heard anything about one of the Authors of the piece, a Father Mario Tosa(sp) who appears to have a connection to George Soros? I read it on the Acton site following the link at the end of Father Z's post...

RS said...

Sure, there is a quote about subsidiarity in the document, but that doesn't change the fact that a large portion of what Cardinal Turkson has suggested (not taught) is in direct opposition to the principle of subsidiarity. Given the multitudes of examples of how fiat money and central banks have been detrimental to human dignity (by robbing those who trimmed their wicks and by funding wars such as the Civil War and all the others the U.S. is currently in) I think it would be silly NOT to be highly suspect of anyone promoting an international central bank.

Yes, many people do not put in the effort to understand what subsidiarity, solidarity, and Distributism acutally are, but there are plenty of people who have - and even those people have raised their eyebrows at what Cardinal Turkson's office has released. If there is a misunderstanding, I think the Vatican takes a huge dose of the blame here.

Also, I think there may be some misapplication of Austrian economics here. While it is easy to do, it's important to separate the Austrian school, which is simply an approach to understanding economics, from how we should actually live our lives according to God's will. Austrians are certainly correct to point out how government manipulates the marketplace (often with grossly evil outcomes - see what prohibition has done). While people who treat Austrian economics as a religion are definitely in the wrong, I don't think they make up the majority of those who promote the lessons to be learned from the Austrian school.

I love your site, by the way. I've been crawling through your archives over the past couple of evenings. Great stuff, keep up the good work.

The Catholic Knight said...

I generally don't trust anything put out by the Acton Institute. They are apologists for the Austrian Libertarian School of Economics. The Distributist Review did some articles on them recently. Here is one of them - http://distributistreview.com/mag/2011/07/is-the-acton-institute-a-genuine-expression-of-catholic-social-thought/

The Catholic Knight said...

RS, thanks for the comment. The document carries no authority or weight, as far as I can tell. It is simply a diagnosis of problems and a possible suggestion for remedy. As it stands right now, a lot of people (from various groups) see the proscribed solutions problematic and in the end, the Vatican may also see them as problematic. I think there is more to this story that has has yet to be written.

Speaking of diagnosis and remedy, it seems like finding the cause of a problem is easy enough, but perscribing a remedy is a little harder. Such could be said of both the Socialists and the Austrian Libertarians. Perhaps the Vatican has fallen into this trap as well. Only time will tell.

Anonymous said...

Mr Knight & Commenters,

Please keep on top of this issue. I don't know what to think.

Luciana

Catawissa Gazetteer said...

This is a really good article explaining the economic reality that underlies the Vatican's statement:

http://bit.ly/sYvgsB

HaroldC said...

http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/1350080?eng=y&fb_source=message

The announcement wasn't properly vetted. No surprise there.

Spiritual Workshops said...

Great post and an interesting article that I wouldn't have heard about were it not for this blog. Thanks for sharing.