(Catholic Insight) - In a meeting with various U.S. Bishops, Pope Benedict XVI said that the consensus which once existed in America supporting “ethical principles deriving from nature and nature’s God,” has faded. “Today that consensus has eroded significantly in the face of powerful new cultural currents which are not only directly opposed to core moral teachings of the Judeo-Christian tradition, but increasingly hostile to Christianity as such,” he said.THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: Pope Benedict XVI has now warned Americans against the dangerous trend of militant Secularisation in the United States. It is, in my own estimation, a trend far more dangerous to us than radical Islam, and threatens to do more harm to our Christian culture than Muslim jihadists could ever do on their best day. Pope Benedict ought to know a thing or two about this. He has lived his entire life in Europe, where he has watched first hand the horrors of Nazism, followed by the post-war Secularisation of European society. Today, Europe is spiritually lost, just as Our Lady of Fatima warned the three seer children almost a century ago. That once great Christian civilisation is no more. The twentieth century killed it. What was the cause of Europe's demise? Was it Nazism? Was it fascism? Was it communism? While all of these things certainly played a role in preparing Europe for her rapid apostasy, it was none of these things that finally brought it about. No. What caused Europeans to give up their faith was nothing more or less than Liberal Progressive Secularism! With mind-blowing speed, Europe was returned to an era where practising Christianity occupied a percentage of the population so shockingly small, that numbers of this type haven't been seen since the days of the ancient Roman Empire. Their embrace of the Secularist mindset brought about this immediate and dramatic decline of Christianity in Europe -- IN LESS THAN ONE GENERATION!!! Radical Secularisation proved to be more effective at eliminating Christianity than Nazism, fascism and communism combined!!!
The Pope was emphatic in insisting that the threat posed by current trends threatens not only Christianity but “humanity itself.” He said: “To the extent that some current cultural trends contain elements that would curtail the proclamation of these truths, whether constricting it within the limits of a merely scientific rationality, or suppressing it in the name of political power or majority rule, they represent a threat not just to Christian faith, but also to humanity itself and to the deepest truth about our being and ultimate vocation, our relationship to God.”
The Pope used strong language to describe the grave situation he perceives in America. “(I)t is imperative, he said, “that the entire Catholic community in the United States come to realise the grave threats to Church’s public moral witness presented by a radical secularism which finds increasing expression in the political and cultural spheres.” He continued, “The seriousness of these threats needs to be clearly appreciated at every level of ecclesial life.”
read full story here
Now the Secularists have set their sights on North America. They have infiltrated our schools, media, government and courts. They occupy the highest offices in the land and sit on the United States Supreme Court. They have been present among us for just as long as the European Secularists, if not longer, and their works are evident. Many of them have ties to known hate-groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan and Neo-Nazis. Yes, some are in our federal government, and even some have sat on the United States Supreme Court. I encourage you to listen to this short audio clip from Constitutional lawyer and radio talk-show host Mark Levin. (I'm not his fan, but I give credit where credit is due.) He will tell you where American Secularism came from and it will shock you. The anti-Catholic bigots are still running America, and they have been for a very long time. Think of it for just a moment. While I am no fan of the former President John F. Kennedy, and he was certainly no paragon of Catholic virtue by any stretch of the imagination, he could not be elected president in this country without first RENOUNCING his faith in public life. This is why I predict that Rick Santorum WILL NOT be nominated for president by the GOP. While the man has many flaws, not as serious as Kennedy's but flaws nonetheless, he has refused to renounce the influence of his Catholic faith on his public life. That killed his campaign right there. Santorum will fizzle in the weeks ahead. Mitt Romney, on the other hand, did renounce his Mormon faith in public life back in 2008. So having bowed to the sterile gods of Secularism, just like J.F.K., he will get his party's nomination. Whether or not he wins the presidency is another story. That depends on different issues.
The Secularisation of the United States and Canada have now reached an unstoppable speed. The Obama administration's recent HHS mandate is just a symptom of this much greater problem. Word has it that another HHS mandate compromise is in the works. We shall see what comes of that, but it changes nothing as far as I'm concerned. Even if the U.S. Catholic Church wins this battle hands down, the fact that they had to fight that battle in the first place clearly signals that the United States of America, I was taught to believe in as a child, does not exist and clearly has not existed for a very long time. The flags, the anthems, the mottos, the pledge, all of it; they are an illusion. The religious freedom these things claim to represent does not exist. Anti-Catholics have been running this federal Union for a very long time. This is why I have joined the League of the South, an organisation heavily influenced by Catholic thinking in regards to freedom of religion, and have become a full-fledged secessionist and Dixie Nationalist. Their Core Beliefs Statement and Statement on Racism were formulated with the help of Catholics and present a future vision of our homeland that no good Catholic can honestly object to. The League's Statement on Obama's attack on Christians demonstrates a clear stand with the U.S. Catholic Church against the Obama administration's recent HHS mandate. The biggest reason why I have joined the League of the South however, is its blatant and unapologetic stand against militant Secularism. There is no other viable political organisation in the United States that takes such a strong stand against the Secularisation of our society. Admittedly, the League of the South is a geographical organisation, representing mainly the sixteen Southern states of Dixie, thirteen of which seceded in 1860 - 61 to form their own nation. One doesn't need to be a Southerner to join the League, but admittedly, the League's interest concerns the South. Catholics in other parts of America are more than welcome to support the League, but I would also encourage them to form their own geographical organisations in opposition to the militant Secularism now promoted by the District of Columbia, otherwise known as 'The Columbian Empire' or 'Washington D.C.' I would strongly encourage Catholic involvement in the Second Vermont Republic and the Third Palmetto Republic. Both of these growing state secession movements will need strong Catholic influence to become successful and prevent an infestation of anti-Catholicism within their ranks. Between the Second Vermont Republic and the Third Palmetto Republic, one will immediately observe two very different ways of addressing social problems, but both can be easily guided by the wisdom of Catholic teaching on Subsidiarity, each in its own way. Catholics should also look into forming new state organisations in other parts of the United States. Why? Because in order to fight back effectively, we must bring into question the authority of Washington D.C. over us. It's the Church's job to transform the faithful, and yes, the laity do have a role in that process. However, when it comes to the political affairs of this world, it is not the Church's job to transform our political institutions. That is specifically the job of the laity. So if you think the Catholic Church is ever going to transform anti-Catholic Washington D.C., you can just get that silly notion out of your head right now. IT'S NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN!!! Rick Santorum, for example, would transform Washington D.C. about as effectively as John F. Kennedy did -- which is nill. The nation's capitol is un-reformable. It's not just the District of Columbia that needs transformation, (a transformation that will never happen), but increasingly we are beginning to see anti-Catholic sentiments in many U.S. states as well. Basically, wherever one sees a strong political push for homosexual 'marriage,' there one will also find a latent anti-Catholic bigotry just beneath the surface. Again though, it's not homosexual 'marriage' that is the problem here, it's just another symptom.
THE PROBLEM IS MILITANT SECULARISM. That's because Secularism and Christianity are two opposing world views, at odds in every way, having virtually nothing in common. Indeed, Christianity and Islam have more in common than Christianity and Secularism. If one believes that Christianity and Islam can never coexist in peace, an assumption sometimes accurate and sometimes not, than the dichotomy between Christianity and Secularism is even greater. THE TWO SYSTEMS CANNOT COEXIST IN PEACE AT ALL. One will always devour the other. The only question is which one will pursue the more aggressive position. For the last sixty-plus years, the more aggressive party has been Secularism. It has destroyed Europe at a mind-blowing speed. North America is next, and the Secularists are well on their way. The momentum is gathering. Christians in North America have this one last window of opportunity to make our last stand before the coming Chastisement of God. We must break the hold that Secular institutions (governments) have upon us. We must deny them their power to govern us. We must make it crystal clear, beyond the shadow of a doubt, in no uncertain terms, that we will not submit to the sterile gods of Secularism any more. They have no power over us.
Like it or not, America's Roman Catholics will play a central role in this struggle. The Church has given her marching orders insofar as she is authorised to give them. We, the Roman Catholics of the United States, have been instructed to disobey any government law or diktat that violates Catholic conscience. Most recently, such an edict has manifested itself in Obama's HHS mandate on artificial contraception, sterilisation and abortion-inducing drugs. What will become of this edict we cannot know right now but it does not matter. Because even if the Catholic Church wins this battle, more will soon follow, and it won't just be against the federal government, but against state governments too. Sadly, most of these state governments are in what is historically known as Yankee or Western territories. So far, the Old South (Dixie) has been the only region that remains legally friendly to the Catholic Church. Catholics must seize on this opportunity while it still lasts -- before this window closes and all is lost.
In addition to what the Catholic Church advocates, which amounts to limited civil disobedience against unjust laws, as a Catholic layman working in the political realm, I am advocating a counter punch against Secularism, which has not been seen since the advance of this evil since the middle twentieth century in Europe and North America. Nobody thus far has called out militant Secularism for what it is -- EVIL. Since it is evil, we must stand against it. We are morally obligated to do so. Thus we must also stand against those private and public institutions that promote it, and this includes not only various state governments, but the United States federal government itself. After more than half a century, the time has finally come to fight back! We are a Christian people, and WE WILL NOT voluntarily submit to a government that opposes our faith. We cannot be expected to submit to militant Secular law any more than we can be expected to submit to Islamic shariah law. Both of them oppose us and both of them are hell bent on devouring us. Therefore, we will not voluntarily submit to them. They must be forced upon us, and indeed they have been in various places, and we have had enough! In the east Christians must deal with Islam, but in the west we must deal with Secularism, and in the west not only is Secularism more dangerous, but we still have a fighting chance against it. This is why I advocate peaceful secession movements, not just in America but in Canada too, and the creation of benign Christian Republics that respect the rights of all without infringing upon our Christian faith or historic Christian culture.
My fellow Catholic readers, you cannot say that anything I've written here is untrue. You know what is happening. The signs are all around us. You know the window of opportunity is closing, and if you stand idly by and do nothing, you have only yourselves to blame. We are Christians, and we are bound by Christ's law of peaceful activism. Let us exercise this law to its fullest extent. Let us peacefully declare the reign of Secularism over! Let us take back our land and our institutions where we can, and let us make our last bold stand as we wait for God to deliver us from evil.
17 comments; post here:
Good luck my fellow Catholics of America and Canada. I don't know if I'll ever have to face such trials as you will.
God save you.
I think we need Catholic celebrities/sports-stars, etc., to get involved with championing subsidiarity in broader society. We also need bishops and prominent Catholic bloggers (such as Sir Knight) to get on board.
We need to think about the topics raised in this article, if we are to participate in the Age of Peace post-Chastisement.
Mr Knight, both you and the pope have chosen the wrong enemy: ISLAM is the militant threat to Christian civilization. The reason why the pope doesnt see it is because he is too wrappred up in ecumenicl "feel good-ism" (as happened at Asissi) Islam is prepared to sweep away both christian and western civilization (secular or not) with the sword. Failure to grasp this essential truth does neither western civilization nor christianity any good. You need to face the demographic and strategic reality. Europe will be muslim in less than 50 years and POOF their secular problem will disappear at the tip of the islamic sword. Pete Frey
Anonymous,
At one point I would have agreed with you, but not now. True, radical Islam is dangerous. However, without radical secularism to defend it Islam is not that big a threat. Radical Islam is open and honest about it's intentions. Secularism is quiet and deceitful. They both compliment each other, but secularism is more dangerous.
Pete, Islam could not destroy European Christianity in over a thousand years of jihad. Secularism destroyed it in less than one generation. The truth is, Islam would be no threat to Western Christianity at all, had Secularism not neutered it first.
Fabulous post today! I'm ready to find an island somewhere away from this mess!!! And, yes...Radical Islam is dangerous, but not as dangerous as we are to ourselves! It's a sad state we're in.
Sir Knight,
Amen and amen!! Now we are faced with the travesty of infanticide being considered legal and licit in the eyes of the radical secular humanists - see articles both on www.wdtprs.com and www.sydneyanglicans.org - this is not coming out of some crack pot think tank in the Netherlands, but out of Oxford!! The morally repugnant views of Peter Singer et al are gaining traction because at its heart, secular humanism/radical secularism has no definition of universal truth and is not interested in it. By the Oxford rules, I'd be dead today!! by Singer's rules, I could have been killed at any point in my childhood prior to the age of seven or twelve, depending upon the pseudo ethical report you read...
As a person with a disability who survived micro premi birth, I am genuinely terrified far before any religious niceties kick in...My fellow readers with a disability here, we need to pray for God's protection double time, because if we're not got for our faith, we'll likely be got for not measuring up to some able bodied's arbitrary measurement of productivity/quality of life/personhood - rumour has it that the hardliners in the Netherlands have openly run non voluntary euthenasia for over 70's up the flagpole. In practice euthenasia is administered there without conscent in not a few instances. What will this mean for the vulnerable prince post skiing accident I wonder...
If people now abordt for blindness and hair lip (which is going on in Australia), these chilling new prospective ideals will permit the taking of life for said condition post birth - God help us!!
A society, any society, is judged by its treatment of the most vulnerable.
Oh God, why are they so quick to reach for the Kill Switch?????? Are the lives of we the supposed less able without value?? What about the deaf blind community - people like Bob Smithdus and the amazing deaf and blind Catholic Priest Fr. Cyril Axelrod??? Nobody listens to them!!
Who will save us from the extermination squads?? Does humanity never learn??
Blessings,
Sarah,
Australia.
If Catholics defended their faith as strongly as Jews and Muslims we would not be having this discussion. Much blame should go to so called Catholic Universities such as Georgetown, Boston College, and Notre Dame that care more about worldly prestige than about actually being Catholic.
The secularists would have us believe that a world without God is a world of peace and love. As Christianity slips away, we see that world coming into being and it's a world of war and hate and total indifference to the rights and sufferings of others. Thankfully God hasn't abandoned us to ourselves. The Church survives. It's up to us to rebuild its membership by opposing the lies of secularism with the balm of truth - the "new evangelization" spoken of by Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. We ignore the Pope at our peril!
I submit to all here that if the Empire had stayed out of the affairs of the Muzzies, a lot of the conflicts with them over the last 50~60 years would not have occured. It's called mind one's own business and we know the Empire simply cannot do that.
Islam does have a level of respect towards orthodox Christianity (Catholicism), the problem is that Western society is so secularised that the Muzzies cannot tell the difference between an orthodox and a secularist.
Confederate Papist,
You have hit the nail on the head!
Pete,
Yes, militant Islam does pose a threat to Europe: Muslims will soon outnumber "Christians" in some EU countries and smoldering conflicts between Muslim and Christian communities have begun (e.g. France). But it appears that radical secularism is behind it.
Radical secularists have extolled materialism and promoted a contraceptive mentality, undermining the Church and depleting the European population. Meanwhile, European governments have initiated large-scale Islamic immigration while supporting war against militant Islam, a war characterized as the "War on Terror" and a "Clash of Civilizations".
Why would European governments support a contraceptive mentality when it was making its population more vulnerable to invasion? Why would it then make up that population shortfall by introducing large-scale immigration of peoples from a culture historically opposed to Christianity (think Crusades) and apparently clashing with western culture rather than prepared to merge with it? And why would those governments participate in or otherwise support a war with their new citizens' co-religionists which must surely cause tensions and split loyalties?
How could secular European governments be so crazy?! Because Christianity and Islam are the only religions that pose a serious threat to radical secularism. Therefore it would make sense to radical secularists in positions of power to undermine and weaken the Church and to bring Christians and Muslims into conflict to wipe each other out.
Those Europeans who have been desensitized to their own religious roots and are bending over backwards to be culturally sensitive to their new citizens are the ones practicing "feel good-ism", not the pope. He is being a realist.
It really is a two-pronged attack on Christendom. (Devil's pitchfork, I presume?)
One one front, we have the militant secularists, who would very much like to have us cease all public expression of faith whatsoever. They would force us to violate our conscience, claiming that faith is irrational: in fact, "reason" is their god. (This may be a holdover from the Enlightenment and the French Revolution.) They would have us believe that science and faith are irreconcilable (are they?), and then declare on the basis of science that faith is unjustified and a silly delusion. "The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God'." They would have us believe that whatever is not tangible or not observable is nonexistent. (I refer to Dawkins, Hitchens (R.I.P., wherever you are now), and Hawking, of course.) They promote "choice", contraception, and materialism, and the effect is now visible: Europe's population is not only declining, it is AGING. This is what secularism does and will do.
On the other front there is militant Islam. By sheer force of reproduction, the global Muslim population exceeded the global Catholic population in 2008. Though not all Muslims are terrorists, there is still an irreconcilable difference between the two, a difference dating all the way back more than a millennium. And the secular governments of Europe, perhaps on the basis of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend", are permitting large-scale Muslim immigration. Add to that signs of increasingly strict imams, radical elements in the Muslim community, culture clashes that turn violent, and we have ourselves a recipe for disaster.
I can feel this Islamic tension right here at home. Here in the Philippines, the southern islands are generally considered a taboo area. The area was Islamified sometime in the 1400s, before Magellan first landed here in 1521. To this day, there are still royal families descended from the old sultanates of Sulu and Lanao, and they still have titles of nobility (which are unrecognized by the government). Clashes between Muslims and Christians are a regular occurrence there, and several radical (read "terrorist") elements there desire secession from the country to create an Islamic state. The only reason the government refuses (besides the fact that they permitted the Muslims to govern themselves within the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao) is that the whole archipelago must remain as a single nation.
How on earth are we going to resolve the never-ending conflict between the cross, the condom, and the crescent? I hope Peter's successor knows where he's steering the bark... because it looks like he'll have to steer it between the Scylla of secularism and the Charybdis of Islam.
AD IESV PER MARIAM,
Filipino Catholic.
To encourage one's own population to decline in numbers while at the same time encouraging immigration from Muslim countries sounds like utter stupidity or a conspiracy to annihilate one's own civilization.
Furthermore, it makes no sense for secularists in France and Britain to say Christianity is anti reason and attack Christianity on the one hand while at the same time, allowing immigration from a religion (Islam) which is exponentially more at odds with reason than Christianity ever could be.
Can anyone explain this madness?
The global elites argue in books and in the media that globalism and secularism are inevitable. Nonsense. People must be unbrainwashed about this self proclaimed inevitability and be convinced that local and national sovereignties are the best possible future for mankind.
Deo Vindice
I think the old saying that "there are none so blind as he who will not see" sheds some light on the "madness" leading to national suicide. Wayward Catholics, preferring the world to God, have "traded-in" their sense of sin for a carefree life. To face reality would burst their comfortable bubble. If this is the case, we should get an idea of how deeply a nation is in the grip of radical secularism by observing the number of Catholics lining up (or not lining up) for confession. Priests in my part of Australia still hear confessions each week but the line of penitents is short (two pews max).
"To encourage one's own population to decline in numbers while at the same time encouraging immigration from Muslim countries sounds like utter stupidity or a conspiracy to annihilate one's own civilization."
[Chop]
"Can anyone explain this madness?"
I can. The secular elitists than make these decisions or policies, or that choose to ignore the law in favour of furthering their agendas don't really care if the "great unwashed" get eliminated as long as they and their progenies (if they don't abort them, of course) are still around to control things.
To wit: the sovereign states within the US occupied Confederate States of America, Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Guam, etc.
Great write up you would like, Sir Knight :)
http://cantuar.blogspot.com/2012/03/if-america-were-fully-catholic-country.html
Post a Comment