Monday, May 7, 2012
The Fall of Multiculturalism and the Rise of Nationalism
THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: On Sunday, May 6th, 2012, the people of the new Europe sent a clear and unmistakable message to the leaders of the European Union -- "it's over." From Paris to Athens, the people have voted in accord with the words of many European leaders over the past couple years -- Multiculturalism is dead! It is an idea that has failed, miserably, and should be relegated to the historical scrap heap of bad ideas. Now, what to do with the wake of destruction it left behind?
Make no mistake about it, the French and Greek voters actually said the same thing last weekend. They just said it in different ways, which were specific to their particular circumstances. In France, the message was particularly financial in nature, in which the French people voted against European austerity measures, and against relinquishing any more sovereignty to the European Union. In Greece it was the same message, but much more profound, adding a cultural element. There the rejection of multiculturalism was more absolute, demanding a return to national identity and sovereignty.
The reaction of the mainstream liberal press in both Europe and North America was predictable. Any time nationalism begins to resurface, these shills of the Globalist elites immediately turn to cries of "extremism, fascism, racism and Nazism." This of course is designed to shut down all dialogue, marginalise the nationalists, and brainwash the general public against them. It's a tactic that has served them well in decades past but not so much any more. In Greece it's easy to demonise nationalists, because they have fully embraced the nationalist message, and that means fully rejecting the ideals of multiculturalism. Of course, anything that is not multiculturalist is obviously racist, or at least that's what the media shills tell us. In France however, it's a little harder, namely because the French have only rejected multiculturalism in a financial level so far. That however doesn't mean the cultural aspect is put aside. No, there have already been attempts to ban the burka and curb public demonstrations of Islamic prayer. In time the rejection of multiculturalism among French natives will arise to a level of open confrontation with French Muslims. Though it cannot be seen clearly now, France is well on its way toward a bloody civil war over this. Greece, while in dire straights economically today, may actually overt a cultural disaster much worse by moving strongly toward nationalism now rather than later.
As the global economic debt situation worsens, and the effects of Islamic immigration into Europe become more evident, the European Union is destined to break apart. However, don't expect the Globalists and Masonic elites to fade quietly into the night. No, these a powerful men with ambitious dreams. They will do whatever they think it takes to make those dreams come to realisation. If they cannot crush nationalism on a political level, then they will try to burn it out physically, by orchestrating confrontations that will likely turn violent. No matter how you slice it, Europe is destined for more civil unrest in the not-too-distant future. The only way Europeans can avoid it is to lie down quietly, and let the multicultural globalists have their way. It's becoming increasingly obvious however that is not going to happen. So violence it shall be. Remember that! First comes the demonising of nationalists. If that doesn't work, then violence will follow. That's how it works in Europe. The power brokers of the European Union have willed it so.
Don't think however that we Americans across the pond will escape all this. The fall of multiculturalism in Europe will spell the end of the EU, and when the EU goes down, it's going to take a lot of American finance down with it. That spells more economic trouble for the United States, which in turn compromises the integrity of the United States federal government. Make no mistake about it; what European elites strive for in the EU, was already accomplished in the United States over a hundred years ago, even if it was by force here and there. That amalgamated cultural "melting pot" that once was the late great United States was abandoned in the 1960s for the multiculturalist model, eventually resulting in a new form of factional nationalism emerging across the southern belt of America. In the southwest, a new Hispanic nation is emerging, one that is neither Mexican nor American, but something in-between. It is only a matter of time before this region of the United States seeks independence. While in the southeast of Old Dixieland, many Americans are returning to the concept of states-rights in the form of "nullification" while others are reintroducing the talk of open "secession." The window of opportunity is closing fast for the United States. Either, the federal government introduces a healthy dose of American nationalism now, by closing the borders and regulating immigration tightly, or it will completely lose control in the not-too-distant future, resulting in the breakup of the USA eventually.
In the end, nationalism is not the normal state of the body politic in any nation. Nationalism is not something that exists naturally. Rather, it is a reaction to something, and in this case, it is a reaction to the failed policies of globalism and multiculturalism. The people have tasted the fruits thereof, and it has caused them to gag. Their reaction is being manifested in the form of nationalism. The movers and shakers of both the EU and the USA would do well to listen to the nationalist message, and look to find ways to implement it in a fair and equitable way.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

6 comments:
I choose secession.
Feds out of Dixie!
Free Florida (my new home)
Free Georgia (my home)
Deo Vindice!
Naturally, many in Dixie feel the same way, and a majority of Americans believe it should be permitted without fear of brutality from the Feds. There is no doubt that Dixie is an organic nation, separate from the other regions of the United States, much in the same way England and Scotland are organically separate nations, though united by one imperial government. I find it odd how Americans have been so brainwashed to think Dixie's independence impossible. Is it impossible for Ireland to be independent of England? It is! Is it impossible for New Zealand to be independent of Australia? It is! For that matter, is it impossible for Canada to be independent of the United States? It is! They are all English-speaking nations in close proximity from to each other. Yet they are each independent. An independent break of Dixie from the rest of the United States is not such a radical idea at all. It's perfectly natural when you really stop and think about it dispassionately.
I lived in Germany in the mid 1990s, and it was an interesting experience (I was not part of or attached to the US Military). This was just after German re-unification, but before the establishment of the Euro as the common currency - so we used Deutsche Marks or Francs when we went shopping.
It was fascinating to listen to all the discussions about the EU and the coming of the Euro and the pros/cons of sovereignty. I tend to be just left of center in most political areas (at least at that time) - but when it came to those family discussions, the entire family branded me a neo-Nazi! And believe me, that is saying something in a German family. I was the odd American who was thoroughly AGAINST these EU integrations!
They didn't/don't understand how I can be such a Nationalist. I see it more as a matter of national sovereignty and citizenship rights. (In Germany or the EU I had neither as a US citizen). The family gave me the whole line about avoiding wars in the future, something they said I couldn't understand. (Amazingly, none of their family died in WWII - several of my family did, including my Grandfather). I pointed out Yugoslavia...they were quiet for a few minutes.
It's going to be a mess there... no doubts. Thanks for the post.
I don't agree with your statement that Europeans should just lie down quietly in the hope things will just blow over with possible reduced consequences. Giving up is no attitude to have. Any European who truly cares about the state of things will stand and fight if they must. I don't mean anyone should go out starting trouble, but if the fight is brought to good honest Europeans, then they should confront it head on.
Only those against the interests of a particular nation are against nationalism in that nation. In an evil empire I would be against nationalism. In any reasonable nation I would be pro nationalism. I define reasonable as a culture that recognizes reality rather than outmoded ideology. Germany is now reasonable; the UK is not.
Antaine, in making that statement I was not advocating for it. Rather I was saying this is what the Globalists want, and it would appear the people of Europe are finally starting to resist it, to their credit.
Post a Comment