A group of three scantily clad women performed a provocative style "liturgical dance" in a recent Franciscan Jubilee Mass for a group of women religious at the cathedral in Joliet, Illinois...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e7b1/1e7b1c521d8682c7b7f15c828befe642d8d9329c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf6dc/cf6dc5a5a518d108f100b298f69563a0710bc4bc" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c36fe/c36fe6832b404870fbff1331d6856e638525e905" alt=""
So-called "liturgical dance" is nothing new. It's one of those innovations that's seen the rounds in this post-conciliar period. Nothing in Vatican II called for such a thing, and nothing in the rubrics of the ordinary mass (Novus Ordo) allows for it. It's just something people made up - out of thin air - appealing to the vague and undefined "spirit of Vatican II."
Below we see a mass presided over by Cardinal Roger Mahoney of Los Angeles in 2005. That's him seated in the background. Yes, this is a mass. At least the young ladies are more appropriately dressed for the occasion, but the every fact that they're dancing around the sanctuary is in itself enough liturgical abuse to make most Catholics cringe...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3547a/3547a918ca6907e735ee34748e03e3486b088e90" alt=""
Here we have an example of liturgical dance gone wild in the diocese of Stockton California in May of this year. A full article was written on this event in the New Oxford Review...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/550f7/550f76f46f7d4d30b0bb17de98181fe357f410f3" alt=""
In what seems to be a whiff of Paganism, we now see dancing women incense the altar of Holy Name Church in the Los Angeles Archdiocese...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74e78/74e78414c02ed0ea5557e1003c64aa85c8cbedf7" alt=""
Again, we see a similar act performed by sisters at the Los Angeles cathedral...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a656/2a656c3b66960c23618061281bec66d09b9ea7b7" alt=""
Ah, as bad as that is, it doesn't hold a candle to a mass celebrated on Sept. 1 2002 at Christ the King Catholic Church, Pleasant Hill, California....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a1f0/4a1f0eb586a2f1655debb9729e9e0bffba8279d5" alt=""
'The Catholic Knight' points this out for a reason. I certainly don't want to shock my readers or enrage them. (Though shock and rage might be the expected normal reaction.) Rather, I point this out to bring attention to a serious problem we're facing in the liturgy of the post-conciliar Church. The ordinary mass (Novus Ordo) we currently celebrate, promulgated under the pontificate of Pope Paul VI, has been easily twisted and abused by those who would like to insert their own personal fancies into the worship of the universal Church. Pope Benedict XVI is about to initiate some reforms designed to reign in the "anything goes" mentality of these modern liturgists. The much anticipated Motu Proprio, liberalizing the celebration of the Tridentine (pre-1970) Latin mass, is expected to be the first step in that reform. Let us pray it comes soon, and produces the pope's desired effect.