Showing posts with label Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Media. Show all posts

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Why Every Catholic Should Detest The New York Times


THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: If you read no other article this weekend, read this one...
(The American Spectator) - The children of Diderot at the New York Times understand the secularist Enlightenment project very well. Its executive editor, Bill Keller, telegraphed this in a 2002 column.

Since he wrote the column before he was promoted to editor, he didn't bother to hide his anti-Catholic bigotry with circumspect throat-clearing. He described himself as a "collapsed Catholic" -- "well beyond lapsed." He affected a false modesty about this, saying that for this reason he claims "no voice in whom the church ordains or how it prays or what it chooses to call a sin." But of course he does claim that voice -- and thinks all should obey it.

He made it clear that he was rooting for "reforms" that would reduce Catholicism to a captive of modern liberalism: "…the struggle within the church is interesting as part of a larger struggle within the human race, between the forces of tolerance and absolutism....

read full story here
The New York Times campaign against the pope (and the Catholic Church in general) is well documented here, here and here.

There is no justifiable reason for anyone claiming the name "Catholic" to subscribe to this blatantly anti-Catholic rag of intolerance and hate toward the Catholic Church and anyone who loves their Catholic Christian faith. I've never had a subscription to The New York Times, but if I did I would cancel it immediately, and publicly burn every paper I continued to receive until the deliveries are finally stopped. I would also tell every Catholic soul I know to do the same.

Catholics ought to cancel their subscriptions to local newspapers as well, if they reprint New York Times articles.

Please pass this message on to every Catholic you know. Here is the link: http://catholicknight.blogspot.com/2010/04/why-every-catholic-should-detest-new.html



Friday, October 17, 2008

James Ossuary Is A Total FRAUD!


THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: Remember the burial box (ossuary) that was supposedly "found" a while back? Those who promoted it claimed it dated back to the time of Jesus and the inscription proved conclusively that the Apostle James was Jesus' actual brother, and therefore, the Catholic doctrine of Mary's perpetual virginity was false. Well a lot of people casted doubt on these fantastic claims, and 'The Catholic Knight' was one of them. Now it looks like we've all been vindicated. As it turns out, the whole thing is a fraud, and the Israeli police are not happy about it...
(FoxNews) - The discovery electrified the faithful and faithful archaeologists alike. But skeptics began to dig deeper into the mysterious find, and Israeli police started investigating.

They found the box was authentically old, dating back to 60 A.D., the biblical date of James' death. But the inscription, they found, was a forgery.

The investigators took Golan to court, accusing the dealer of turning believers' faith against them to rake in his millions, TIME reported....

read full story here

Thursday, September 11, 2008

News Media's Take On Palin

THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT:  After watching some of the interview of Governor Sarah Palin by ABC's Charles Gibson, and taking in everything the mainstream news media has said about Governor Palin over the last two weeks, I have come to two conclusions.

One, Governor Palin holds up well to some of the worst media anal exam ever dished out in recent memory.  And two, the mainstream news media really, really, REALLY hates her - almost as much as the Democrats hate her.  When you consider how anti-Catholic and anti-Evangelical the mainstream news media is, that in itself is enough reason for me to like her.

Prepare for things to get worse, much worse. Already reports are coming in about journalists cruising bars in Alaska, offering money for any dirt on Palin. At this rate, it won't be long before people start making things up. As we've seen on the Internet, some people are more than willing to manufacture stories just for political reasons. Throw money into the mix, and no telling what kind of whoppers will come next.

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Obama Responsible For Sexist Media Attack On Palin


THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: It was Barack Obama's own campaign who launched the sexist attack on Governor Sarah Palin, and it was only after this, the mainstream media took it as a permission slip to do the same. In the initial moments following John McCain's announcement of his V.P. pick, the Obama campaign sprung into immediate action with the worst example of sexist mudslinging....
(The Weekly Standard) - “Today, John McCain put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency. Governor Palin shares John McCain’s commitment to overturning Roe v. Wade, the agenda of Big Oil and continuing George Bush’s failed economic policies — that’s not the change we need, it’s just more of the same,” said Bill Burton, Obama Campaign Spokesman.

source
Hillary Clinton supporters ought to be appalled. Is this not the epitome of the "glass ceiling" phenomenon in America? Though 'The Catholic Knight' has more problems with Hillary's politics than I can count, I have to give credit where credit is due. Hillary Clinton was far more qualified to run for president than Barack Obama. She spent far more time in the Senate, where she actually worked to get things done. She actually lobbied for specific legislation, and then was not afraid to vote for it, or even put her name on it. Former President Bill Clinton admitted from the earliest days of his administration (indeed, even before he was elected president), that Hillary played a much bigger role than the traditional public relations spokeswoman often seen in most first ladies. According to Bill, when the people elected him, they got her too, and Whitehouse insiders have since reported that Hillary played a very central role in the Bill Clinton administration. Could we call this "executive experience?" Perhaps we could, at least, in a limited way. So here we have a perfectly qualified woman running for president in the Democratic Party, and what happens? She's upstaged, and eventually forced out, by a young, handsome and articulate man, who is far less experienced, and not nearly as qualified. Hillary may have put 18 million cracks in the Democratic glass ceiling, but that wasn't good enough for the Democratic Party establishment. The glass ceiling holds strong - at least in the Democratic Party.

Then upon learning that Senator John McCain had selected a woman for the Republican vice presidential nominee, Obama's campaign immediately launches into an attack that diminishes her experience. Ironically, when one includes all of Sarah Palin's political experience in elected office, she actually has more than Barack Obama. When one includes her experience in appointed office, it surpasses Obama's again. When one includes her experience fighting government corruption as a "community organizer," she again surpasses Obama. Then when one considers the amount of executive experience held by Palin (something that directly pertains to the office of vice president), she outranks Obama by considerable margin. So once again, we have the same story of a young, handsome and articulate man trying to upstage (and even belittle) a woman with far more experience and qualifications than he has. Within hours of making this sexist attack, the Obama campaign back-peddled and decided to congratulate Palin on her historic nomination. Obama later admitted his error...
(Politico) - At a stop in Monaca, Pa., Barack Obama seemed to distance himself from his campaign's first, harshly critical response to the Palin pick.

"I think that...campaigns start getting these hair triggers and the statement that Joe and I put out reflects our sentiments," he said, according to the pool report, apparently criticizing his staff for going overboard, as he did occasionally in the primary.

He was referring to a more gracious statement of congratulations he issued later with Biden, which he then reiterated.

"I haven't met her before. She seems like a compelling person ... with a terrific personal story....

source
'The Catholic Knight' applauds Senator Obama's retraction of his campaign's initial sexist attack. However, that's not good enough. The Obama campaign's initial response was a clear signal to the media to "go sexist" on the "experience" issue, and simply retracting the initial statement is like trying to unring a bell after it's already been rung. If Obama wants to make things right, he's going to have to come out strongly against the media attacks on Palin's well-qualified experience. He's going to have to condemn those media attacks as sexist in nature, and call for them to stop. If he doesn't, he is complicit with them. After all, it was his campaign that started it.  Let's see if he's man enough to do the right thing.

Monday, September 1, 2008

Media Zeros In On Palin For Hatchet Job


THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: As I predicted, the Christophobic Leftist media is attempting to zero in on Governor Sarah Palin for a hatchet job against her character and her family. Immediately after the announcement of John McCain's selection of her for vice presidential nominee, MSNBC pounced into action...
(WorldNetDaily) - From the very first moment that John McCain's selection of Sarah Palin for his Republican running mate was announced, the MSNBC news network was engaged in a deliberate attempt to smear the Alaska governor, according to Fox News host Bill O'Reilly.

During Friday night's edition of "The O'Reilly Factor," the Fox anchor displayed MSNBC's "breaking news" graphic, which ran the message, "How many houses does Palin add to the Republican ticket?"...

read full story here
Then, that very same afternoon, Alan Colmes, a liberal commentator on FoxNews, posted an entry on his blog in which he accused Palin of having a shotgun wedding twenty years ago to avoid an illegitimate child (read source here). He titled the post "Conservative Family Values," in what was an obvious jab at her Evangelical Christian beliefs. Colmes' theory turned out to be total bunk, and his reputation was further tarnished because of it, but this little episode was just a tiny foretaste of what would come over the weekend. With Colmes' Christophobic attack on Palin, the initial salvo defaulted to that classic "family values" line, in which Leftists attempted to muddy the Palin name on moral issues (which they care little about to begin with), for the sole purpose of trying to turn conservative Christian voters away from Sarah Palin.

Colmes may not have intended it, but his blog post sent a political shockwave into the Internet blogosphere. It was a shockwave that other Liberal bloggers took as a permission slip to do whatever they wanted. They sprung into action immediately, concocting a complete fabrication about the legitimacy of Palin's fifth child, Trig, who was born just four months ago. The fabrication was probably developed around some rumors these bloggers may have heard from Alaska. Rumors that centered around Palin's seventeen year old daughter, Bristol, who either is, had been, or might be, pregnant. Rather than investigating these rumors, the leftist bloggers simply filled in the details with their own imagination. By the time they were through, four month old Trig was now Bristol's son, and Bristol's alleged "pregnancy" had been hidden by Sarah Palin herself. The Alaska governor was accused of faking her own pregnancy, and then passing Bristol's child, Trig, off as her own! Most sensible folks would dismiss this sort of stuff as the tabloid ramblings of frustrated political hacks. But it wasn't long before our mainstream press was looking into the matter and asking questions. As word of this got out, the Palin family decided to release some personal family information, which was no secret in Alaska, and was already well known by the McCain campaign during the vetting process that eventually led to Palin's selection as McCain's running mate. The press release read as follows...
(Washington Post) - "We have been blessed with five wonderful children who we love with all our heart and mean everything to us," said Sarah and Todd Palin in a statement. "Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents. As Bristol faces the responsibilities of adulthood, she knows she has our unconditional love and support."

read full story here
As news of this broke, liberal bloggers on the Internet were humiliated but defiant. Now the truth was out and they looked like idiots. There was no cover-up, no baby-switching, and no fake pregnancy.  The real story of Bristol Palin's teen pregnancy is not quite as scandalous, but nevertheless something for the Leftist Christophobic media to sink their teeth into. Unlike media Leftists, people who really understand Christianity know that this sort of thing happens in all families - including Christian families. While this is not the ideal situation based on Christian morality, the real test of one's Christian faith comes in how one deals with it once it happens. The Christian response is to accept responsibility for one's actions, not run away from it, as so many Liberals advocate through their sacrament of abortion-on-demand. In the Palin teen pregnancy story, what we have is an example of how Christians are supposed to deal with the problem when teenagers commit the sin of sexual impatience. They own up to their actions, acknowledge their faults, and take responsibility for the consequences. Bristol Palin is going to keep her baby, and marry the father. She and her new husband will make whatever sacrifices they must to raise their newborn child, and in doing so they will give testimony to the sanctity of human life as well as the practical maturity provided by their Christian faith. People who don't understand Christianity, (most of the Liberal media and Leftist bloggers for example), will point fingers at the "bastard child," and the "fornication" of two "religious hypocrites" in the Palin family. In doing so they only prove that they don't have a clue, and they have no concept of what the Christian religion is really about. A "practicing Christian" is by no means a "perfect Christian." If one were already "perfect" then one wouldn't need to "practice." The definition of a "practicing Christian" is one who takes the teachings of Christianity seriously, and is attempting to live by them, in spite of one's faults and mistakes. By definition, "practicing Christians" don't attempt to redefine Christian morality to fit their own sinful habits, nor do they try to "lower the bar" of Christian standards just because they can't seem to meet them. Rather, a "practicing Christian" just keeps trying to get it right, over and over again, until eventually he (or she) is successful. The duty of Christian families is to provide love and support to their family members, even when they fail, while at the same time encouraging them to take responsibility for their failures, and to keep reaching upward toward the ideal standard. The Palin family has done just that. It is a perfect example of how Christians deal with personal failings, and how their faith helps them recover without lowering the standard.

The reason why 'The Catholic Knight' brings this to you is threefold. I wish to first call your attention to the insidious and shameful way some Christophobic left-wingers will think nothing of fabricating complete lies if they believe it might help them politically. Second, some members of the mainstream media will gladly sacrifice their objectivity, and therefore their credibility, for the purpose of political gain. Third and finally, prepare for it to get worse -- a lot worse.

It's the third point I want to touch on the most, because I want to prepare my readers for the next logical step. The Leftist mainstream media is incredibly Christophobic. By that I mean they fear Christian political involvement, and especially a political alliance between conservative Evangelicals and practicing Catholics. They know that any such social alliance on political matters will seriously threaten their Leftist political agenda. The fact that Obama hasn't done nearly as well in the polls as he should be doing at this time is making them nervous. For the first time this election year, it looks as if it is possible McCain might actually win, and that simply will not be tolerated. The media will go after Sarah Palin ruthlessly on the national level, just as they did in Alaska during her election bid for governor of that state in 2006. Palin is McCain's biggest political asset right now, so in order to hurt McCain, the media must attack Palin. Right now they're just going after her personal family baggage. As soon as they realize that this isn't working, they'll take it to a different area of her life, and one in which they feel far more comfortable attacking -- her religion.

The purpose of a religious attack on Palin is very specific. The Leftist media is going to attempt to crack a social alliance between Evangelicals and practicing Catholics. The idea being to make Palin the focus of controversy between these two groups, and "hopefully" break a Republican political stronghold.

It is the opinion of this blogger that in a very short time, Sarah Palin's church will come under media scrutiny, and as soon as they think they have the dirt they need, they're going to take it right to the public, but it will be especially directed toward Catholics. I believe the media will try to do the exact same thing it did last year with Governor Mike Huckabee. They will try to pit Christian voters against each other. My guess is they'll find some obscure quote from the pastor of Palin's Evangelical church that appears to contradict the teachings of the Catholic Church in some way. Then they'll present it to the world as something like "Palin's Church Hate's Catholics." The stories they publish will question the role of religion in Palin's life and label her religion as "extreme," with the hope of polarizing the practicing Christian vote enough to turn Catholics against Evangelicals and vice versa. Beware of the coming attack, and whatever you do, don't take the bait. It is designed to manipulate us.

Thursday, August 28, 2008

NBC Admits To Supporting Gay Agenda

(LifeSiteNews.com) - The National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA) just held its annual convention here in Washington D.C., attracting hundreds of journalists - and ringing endorsements - from virtually every major publication and broadcaster in the news media.

In a full-page ad in the convention program, NBC Universal declared it is "proud to support NLGJA," under the bold headline: "YOUR VICTORIES ARE OUR VICTORIES....

read full story here
THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: It is yet more confirmation of what we always suspected. The mainstream media is fully behind the advancement of the gay-agenda which includes gay-marriage, gay-adoptions, and pro-gay indoctrination of public school children. At least it's nice to know who your enemies really are.

Monday, May 7, 2007

Statement of Protestant Leaders against Anti-Catholic Bigotry

THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: Isn't it encouraging how a little bit of persecution forces Christians of various denominations to start doing what we should have been doing all along. In the wake of widespread anti-Catholic bigotry, incited by so-called "liberals" on the political Left, some Evangelicals are calling upon all Protestants to stand with their Catholic brethren and condemn this kind of vile prejudice. The Statement reads as follows...
May 6, 2007

As Protestant Christians and as Americans, we condemn the grotesque anti-Catholic bigotry that is now on display as a result of the Supreme Court's recent decision upholding the constitutionality of the federal law prohibiting partial-birth abortion.

We denounce as particularly odious a cartoon published by the Philadelphia Inquirer depicting the five justices who formed the majority in the case wearing Catholic bishops' mitres. Scarcely less offensive were the comments of law professor, and former University of Chicago Law School Dean, Geoff Stone identifying the Catholic religious affiliation of the justices forming the majority and accusing these distinguished and honorable jurists of imposing their religion rather than faithfully interpreting the Constitution.

We believe it is our particular duty to condemn the bigotry we are now witnessing in view of the history of anti-Catholicism in our nation. It is a stain on the Protestant Christian conscience that at one time many of our people accepted the vile teachings of Paul Blanshard in his book American Freedom and Catholic Power, and supported the anti-Catholic agenda of the group founded by Blanshard and others that now styles itself "Americans United for Separation of Church and State" (formerly known as Protestants and other Americans united for Separation of Church and State).

Just as Pope John Paul II acknowledged past injustices committed by Catholics, or committed in the name of Catholicism, against Protestants, Jews, and others and pledged to work against any revival of these injustices, we acknowledge past Protestant prejudices against Catholics and pledge to fight against the anti-Catholic bigotry we are now witnessing. Our Catholic brothers and sisters will not have to wait to hear our voices forcefully raised against the bigotry now directed against them.

Because evil begets evil, we are not surprised that bigotry would emerge among those who have placed themselves in the service of the moral abomination known as partial-birth abortion. For our part, we praise any judge, statesman, or citizen-irrespective of religious affiliation-who steps forward to tell the truth about the injustice of this horrific practice, or to expose the lie that baby-killing is somehow protected by our Constitution.

We call on our fellow Protestant Christians of every denomination-including those denominations that do not share our view that the life of the child in the womb must be honored and protected by law-to join with us in condemning the new anti-Catholicism that has, in the aftermath of the partial-birth abortion decision, reared its ugly head. We hope that no Protestant Christian will bring shame on himself or herself and on the great tradition of Reformed Christianity by participating in this appalling bigotry or remaining mute in the face of it.

We also call on groups that present themselves as enemies of prejudice, including "Americans United for Separation of Church and State," to join with us in condemning the Philadelphia Inquirer cartoon and other manifestations of anti-Catholic bigotry. This is a time of testing for them. Are they selective opponents of prejudice? Do they regard anti-Catholicism as an acceptable form of bigotry? Are they content to see Catholics treated in ways that they would be the first to condemn if the victims were members of other religious traditions or minorities? By responding or failing to respond to our plea to them to join us in condemning the injustice being suffered by our Catholic fellow citizens, we will soon know whether their claim to oppose prejudice and bigotry is an honest one or mere hypocrisy.

SOURCE



The Philadelphia Inquirer published this cartoon by Tony Auth